Comments Thread For: Merchant Gives His Take on Mayweather IV Scandal

[GTTofAK]

You think if I didn't know what the word meant I couldn't just google it?

I'm sure by now you did. And you know you were wrong.

Here is what is sad. Mike Tyson uses big words more correctly than you do.

[IMDAZED]

I'm sure by now you did. And you know you were wrong.

B*tch please. "Evidence."

[GTTofAK]

B*tch please. "Evidence."

Silence is evidence of guilt Salinas v. Texas. Refusal to answer is evidence that you know you were wrong.

[IMDAZED]

Silence is evidence of guilt Salinas v. Texas. Refusal to answer is evidence that you know you were wrong.

Refusal to answer what? Go on, bury yourself.

[GTTofAK]

Refusal to answer what? Go on, bury yourself.

You said its hearsay. I asked you to define hearsay. You haven't. Silence is evidence.

[IMDAZED]

You said its hearsay. I asked you to define hearsay. You haven't. Silence is evidence.

You still talking about that?

Trying to win a dictionary war instead of the topic you raised. You b*tch

[aboutfkntime]

:Initially, I heard the exact same thing. And yet..... NSAC also investigated, and they also cleared Mayweather of any wrongdoing."

nsac first pointed out that as per their regulation what happened was illegal!

then...

nsac cleared mayweather!

hep hep hurray!

this flip flop is the flip flop of the century!

I didn't read everything that came out, but I recall early in the piece some NSAC official stated that the right protocol hadn't been followed.

NSAC then investigated, which is what you would expect considering the breach of protocol, and they determined that Mayweather did nothing wrong.

You are correct, technically that is a flip-flop..... but hardly flip-flop of the century. I dont care about dotting i's and crossing t's, so long as Mayweather was clean.

[b00g13man]

No one has to present any "evidence" to you. And since there isn't a court case going on, no one has to provide hard docs either. Do you think they provided Hauser with the 2700 pages of medical docs? If not, I guess they're lying about that too? See how ****** your reasoning is? Probably not.

Loooooooool. These losers don't realise that it's already over. Evidence? The **** for? There's no case to answer.

[aboutfkntime]

He was informed at around 1:45pm. Actually earlier since the guards wouldn't just let in any person in a gated subdivision without informing the resident involved. The weigh-in was at around 3pm and the IV infusion was done after all the ceremonies of the weigh-in.

I didn't see him vomiting and he didn't give that out as a reason why he needed an IV. He said that his urine was dark or darker. He never mentioned vomiting.

And his IV was administered after the ceremonies of the weigh-in so that's several hours already after being notified of being needed to give a urine sample.

WADA is the gold standard. USADA already said it was not against NSAC rules when it happens to be so, so what kind of investigation do you expect?

And NSAC didn't say that they conducted an investigation. They just said that thay had no problem with what mayweather did even if it was against the rules if you read NSAC regulations.

Look you are mostly correct, I think that both USADA and NSAC initially reported abnormalities with the process..... but no protocol allows for all possible eventualities, a process is a living document and will be improved/corrected if required.

So long as Mayweather was clean and nothing inappropriate occured.

This situation is certainly no worse than when WADA collected urine samples from Brandon Rios using a dirty glass and in full view of the public.

Because of the abnormalities you mentioned maybe USADA should publish a report covering their process/findings, but this is mostly rumor-mongering and innuendo.

[aboutfkntime]

Okay you are ******. Do you understand what IV means. There is a reason no one has ever even heard of getting an IV in your ass until you invented it.

A colleague of mine takes it up the ass all the time.....