Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Why couldn't you have just stayed in the Mayweather IV master thread.

    Save the rest of us the grief.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
      Are you asking me or Brian Kenny from ESPN that started that question in verbatim?

      An intelligent answer is WADA accredited labs doing EPO, CIR, HGH, which my friend, require blood drawn. Should I draw this for you?
      bold means WADA style testing.

      what protocol was NSAC using for their doping test in 2010?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by SilverMiles View Post
        Why couldn't you have just stayed in the Mayweather IV master thread.

        Save the rest of us the grief.
        he is trying to educate us, can't you see?

        Comment


        • #44
          When Floyd was asked about the IV he said he was dehydrated and one of the reasons he gave for being dehydrated was from giving blood.

          Comment


          • #45
            i think manny was suspect in '10, particularly because of his involvement with alex ariza.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by SilverMiles View Post
              Why couldn't you have just stayed in the Mayweather IV master thread.

              Save the rest of us the grief.
              He's clearly stricken over the recent news in regards to Floyd's highly su****ious use of IVs. Being unable to rationalize or defend Floyd's actions has caused him to have a mental breakdown, it's truly a sad sight to behold.

              Comment


              • #47
                Him and Arum did suggest giving the commission the funds to undergo WADA like advanced testing, like Arum said "I don't trust USADA, we need a neutral organization" and with all that's happened I think he was right to.

                It's su****ious because there were alot of excuses spiraling.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by New England View Post
                  i think manny was suspect in '10, particularly because of his involvement with alex ariza.
                  I remember when floyd groupies would always say that.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Hype job View Post
                    Well they ended up earning more in 2015 than they would have in their peak unfortunately.


                    and they fought other guys at an inflated rate for the 6ish years fans wanted the fight.


                    boxing is a crazy, crazy sport. there's nothing like it in the world, and there never will be.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Rath View Post
                      bold means WADA style testing.

                      what protocol was NSAC using for their doping test in 2010?
                      Again, "bold means by me" or for the hundredth time, what Brian Kenny stated in VERBATIM, hence, word for word?

                      Why do you keep following me around? I don't mind it, but you never provide a realistic opinion on something I layed out my view of you is you're obsessed with me in a hope do "disprove" objective reasoning. That's going to be very hard for you buddy. I'm not your typical poster as you expect...

                      So I ask you, in another form to perhaps "win you," why did Brian Kenny, an ESPN Pro-Pac network commentator, narrarate that in the program? Surely you have an opinion on that?

                      To your last question, "what protocol was the NSAC using in 2010?" Protocol for what? Be specific, what bouts? Their anti-doping "protocol?" If a fighter chooses to use them for testing then I guess the labs that are hired to test results for said bout.

                      I don't think you know what you're talking about.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP