Soooooooooooooo Has Usada and Nsac sued Thomas Hauser yet???

[tangalog2200]

I have realised that many posters don't understand the basics of forming an article. You have just given an irrelevant response. You're no different to a dim 15 year old who just who regurgitates a series of quotes in the hopes that one of them will stick.

you might as well look back yourself in a mirror...

generic rhetoric is all you have here...

[Real King Kong]

they did.

and floyd lost and had to pay AND APOLOGIZE to manny.

boxingscene has an article on it.

I think he meant the iv thing...not the ****** slander lawsuit that wasted the courts time.

[MRBOOMER]

What are they gonna sue him for? Does he have some large amount of money nobody knows about? On top of that its been blown over and swept under the rug already. If there is any truth to it we won't know for awhile.

I swear yall seem to think suing people is free and a short process. It would also risk the chance of them getting exposed for something if they are actually on the shady side.

[tangalog2200]

What are they gonna sue him for? Does he have some large amount of money nobody knows about? On top of that its been blown over and swept under the rug already. If there is any truth to it we won't know for awhile.

I swear yall seem to think suing people is free and a short process. It would also risk the chance of them getting exposed for something if they are actually on the shady side.

you may unknowingly have given the best reason to sue....

"It would also risk the chance of them getting exposed for something if they are actually on the shady side."

when they don't sue, the issue of them really hiding something comes to a boil..

[Ray*]

Why would they sue him? moreover it would be a difficult process to go through. He comes out with allegation and they counter it and put it to bed in the eyes of normal people...Its over and simple.

[Ray*]

Why do Manny fans and Floyd haters pretend Hauser has credibility and that another response is warranted?

Anyone know what Hauser is up to now?

That's wt makes me laugh the most lol. I swear i just laugh when am reading their post along with his articles.

[saintpat]

I don't think USADA not suing Hauser carries any more meaning than Hauser not suing them ... they made claims in their refutation that his report contained false information, which in legal theory smears his reputation as a journalist, but he isn't suing them for harming his reputation.

Lack of a lawsuit on either part isn't the same as affirmation of the other side. That's just silly.

[tangalog2200]

I don't think USADA not suing Hauser carries any more meaning than Hauser not suing them ... they made claims in their refutation that his report contained false information, which in legal theory smears his reputation as a journalist, but he isn't suing them for harming his reputation.

Lack of a lawsuit on either part isn't the same as affirmation of the other side. That's just silly.

there are flaws in your view up there...hauser challenged usada's lengthy response as inadequate for not really addressing the issues with facts...

hauser is a journalist and his job is to report....and that he did...

usada's job is to test in accordance with all the relevant rules...and they did not..

nsac's job is to enforce the rules..and they did not...

nsac is supposed to be fair and square...and they were not..

nsac is supposed to be firm...and they flip flopped big time..

usada and nsac both did cya acts on prime time....

and cleared floyd of any wrong doing...hep hep hurray!

[Lester Tutor]

there are flaws in your view up there...hauser challenged usada's lengthy response as inadequate for not really addressing the issues with facts...

hauser is a journalist and his job is to report....and that he did...

usada's job is to test in accordance with all the relevant rules...and they did not..

nsac's job is to enforce the rules..and they did not...

nsac is supposed to be fair and square...and they were not..

nsac is supposed to be firm...and they flip flopped big time..

usada and nsac both did cya acts on prime time....

and cleared floyd of any wrong doing...hep hep hurray!

Yes, and Hauser will then decide to share a new article in detail to challenge USADA's lengthy response. We will see it online when Floyd returns for his 50-0 bout.

[GTTofAK]

Can't sue when someone phrases his entire article in a speculative fashion. Keep crying and keep trying though.

Nope there are many things that USADA claimed were not factual such as what they were paid by TMT. Misstatements of fact are the most comon forms of libel. If USADA were telling the truth they would sue Hauser. However, they know Hauser has the original contract so they can claim he is wrong but they know that is not true.