Will Manny Pacquaio ever recover from his Floyd loss?
Collapse
-
no. but im younger and sexier than you will ever be.
that's a fact.
actually you are.I didn't say I know anything. I'm not making any kind of statment of "He WILL be damaged!" Or "He won't be damaged!" like you're ridiculously attempting to do.
you're basically implying it but hiding like a coward straddling both fences he could or couldnt.
IM TELLING YOU HE'S GONNA RECOVER.
Floyd isnt some soul taking power puncher.
he's a slap boxing specialist. he doesnt hurt people the way heavy handed high volume power punches.
no you're not.I am merely stating that there's most definitely a possibility that he might, considering the circumstances. Whereas you're trying to say that it's a fact that he won't.
you're trying to cover both possibilities in an attempt to never be wrong.
straddling both fences again.But as my post clearly states, my opinion is it more than likely won't have an effect. However, we will have to wait and see if it does.
im implying it based on harder loses that pacquiao suffered in comparison to the glorified sparring session he had vs floyd where he was never hurt or in any danger.I genuinely don't know if you've read the thread, more than likely not considering your response here but I don't know for sure because your comprehension seems reasonably poor, but I've already addressed most of those points you just made and those points are far from "evidence" that he theres no chance he will be effected. As I previously mentioned, it's naive to think there's no possible way he will be effected by the loss. To imply that is just ****ing ******, frankly.
that literally does.I'll address them again anyway;
The fact that Pacquaio he's said he wants a rematch or if he genuinely believes he won is irrelevant. Pacquaio can say whatever he wants no one knows for sure where his mental state is at.
he didnt go all george foreman isolation, he didnt develop a drug habit to cope with his loss etc..
so basically you agree with me but just want to play devil's advocate.Pacquaio's previous loss's are also irrelevant. He's already shown he's bounced back from those and just because he's bounced back before doesn't mean he will this time. There's only so many times a guy can bounce back especially at the advanced stage of his career that Pacquaio is at.

and ive already explained why this whole illegal iv drip has mitigated what you just posted. pacquao feels vindicated EVEN if what hauser said about floyd isnt true.Pacquaio has never lost a fight of this magnitude, this was far and beyond the biggest fight of his life and one of the biggest fights ever and he came up short. Whether he believes that's just or not it doesn't change the fact he took an L and let so many people down. That could easily effect the strongest of men especially considering the draining amount of time and effort that has been put into this half a decade long feud.
its enough for a man who fights for a living.
UNLIKE YOU.
I know, because i fight.
UNLIKE YOU.
lol wut?The fact Pacquaio has a nation on his back only raises the chance of him being effected by the loss.
I CATEGORICALLY DISAGREE.
The fact that he has lost already several times IN FAR MORE SEVERE FASHION is evidenced of that. If your only devil's advocate evidence of not being able to recover mentally is that this fight was historically huge, you dont have much. Again, mitigated by the iv controversy. Look at the pacquiao fans, you think they want to believe pacquiao lost to a clean fighter?
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
because body and mind is connected.You're bringing up physical damage again and for the life of me I don't know why.
do try to keep up old man.
Now once again I will make it clear that personally I do think Pacquaio will bounce back once again. I'll also make it clear that we won't know that until he shows us.you basically agree pacquiao will recover but somehow you are involved in a flame war just for the sake of playing devil's advocate.If you're going to respond please don't make the same redundant points. Save us all some time.
talk about redundant.
log off old man and get ready for your dinner at 5.Comment
-
"If you're going to respond don't repeat the same redundant points. Save us all some time"no. but im younger and sexier than you will ever be.
that's a fact.
actually you are.
you're basically implying it but hiding like a coward straddling both fences he could or couldnt.
IM TELLING YOU HE'S GONNA RECOVER.
Floyd isnt some soul taking power puncher.
he's a slap boxing specialist. he doesnt hurt people the way heavy handed high volume power punches.
no you're not.
you're trying to cover both possibilities in an attempt to never be wrong.
straddling both fences again.
im implying it based on harder loses that pacquiao suffered in comparison to the glorified sparring session he had vs floyd where he was never hurt or in any danger.
that literally does.
he didnt go all george foreman isolation, he didnt develop a drug habit to cope with his loss etc..
so basically you agree with me but just want to play devil's advocate.

and ive already explained why this whole illegal iv drip has mitigated what you just posted. pacquao feels vindicated EVEN if what hauser said about floyd isnt true.
its enough for a man who fights for a living.
UNLIKE YOU.
I know, because i fight.
UNLIKE YOU.
lol wut?
I CATEGORICALLY DISAGREE.
The fact that he has lost already several times IN FAR MORE SEVERE FASHION is evidenced of that. If your only devil's advocate evidence of not being able to recover mentally is that this fight was historically huge, you dont have much. Again, mitigated by the iv controversy. Look at the pacquiao fans, you think they want to believe pacquiao lost to a clean fighter?
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
because body and mind is connected.
do try to keep up old man.
you basically agree pacquiao will recover but somehow you are involved in a flame war just for the sake of playing devil's advocate.
talk about redundant.
log off old man and get ready for your dinner at 5.
You proceed to do so anyway
It has nothing to do with being "right or wrong" I couldn't care less about being right.
I've not implied anything infact I've actually clearly stated that I personally THINK that he won't be. That's what I personally think. I'm simply pointing out despite what I think there's a possibility he might. Which is obvious.
I'm saying it's possible he could be effected by the loss.
You're saying it's impossible he could be effected the the loss.
We will let the readers decide which line of thinking is ******
Last edited by IronDanHamza; 09-19-2015, 02:11 PM.Comment
-
Being knocked out is both physically and emotionally damaging. It will change a fighters psyche forever. Losing to a guy who clinched, ducked, and threw a few punches with no steam on them, is frustrating. You'd leave being pissed off that he fought like that. You wouldn't be destroyed psychologically by it. I doubt you'd even be that distraught by it because you wouldn't really feel defeated.Comment
-
actually we will let pacquiao's next fight decide that."If you're going to respond don't repeat the same redundant points. Save us all some time"
You proceed to do so anyway
It has nothing to do with being "right or wrong" I couldn't care less about being right.
I'm saying it's possible he could be effected by the loss.
You're saying it's impossible he could be effected the the loss.
We will let the readers decide which line of thinking is ******
he wins and you will pretend to never question it because you straddle both sides in a pathetic attempt to look wise but really its just a way for you to cover yourself.
"see i knew pacquiao was gonna recover even though i was involved in a flame war questioning his recovery."
you're a floyd fan cliche.
Comment
-
How will Pacquaio's next fight decide that?actually we will let pacquiao's next fight decide that.
he wins and you will pretend to never question it because you straddle both sides in a pathetic attempt to look wise but really its just a way for you to cover yourself.
"see i knew pacquiao was gonna recover even though i was involved in a flame war questioning his recovery."
you're a floyd fan cliche.

Your brain is fascinating to me.
Pacquaio's next fight will prove if he once again has the mental strength to bounce back from defeat, much like he has in the past or it will prove that this was one time too many. We will only know that when we see it. Once again no one knows his mental state. Not even psychics like you
And I will say again to consider it out of the realms of possibility that he COULD be effected by the loss is just naive and frankly ******.
It's like you read the words but they don't process in your head.
How clearer do I have to make my stance? How can I make it easier for you to understand what my stance is? My stance is that I believe Pacquaio will bounce back. I believe that because I have watched Pacquaio for a long time and I know what kind of fighter he is and what kind of mental strength he has.
That is my stance. No double meanings, no implications, just black and white plain English.
I'm also not going to act surprised if I'm wrong because obviously there is a possibility that I could be wrong here considering the circumstances.
I hope that makes it easier for you albeit I doubt it.Comment
-
Loooool. One thing I've come to realise is that we take logic and reason for granted. We can take a situation, apply what appears to be the most basic logic and then arrive at the right conclusion.How will Pacquaio's next fight decide that?
Your brain is fascinating to me.
Pacquaio's next fight will prove if he once again has the mental strength to bounce back from defeat, much like he has in the past or it will prove that this was one time too many. We will only know that when we see it. Once again no one knows his mental state. Not even psychics like you
And I will say again to consider it out of the realms of possibility that he COULD be effected by the loss is just naive and frankly ******.
It's like you read the words but they don't process in your head.
How clearer do I have to make my stance? How can I make it easier for you to understand what my stance is? My stance is that I believe Pacquaio will bounce back. I believe that because I have watched Pacquaio for a long time and I know what kind of fighter he is and what kind of mental strength he has.
That is my stance. No double meanings, no implications, just black and white plain English.
I'm also not going to act surprised if I'm wrong because obviously there is a possibility that I could be wrong here considering the circumstances.
I hope that makes it easier for you albeit I doubt it.
This simple skill unfortunately evades many.Comment
-
Comment
-
convincing? ha ha ha haMaybe.
But there's only so many times a guy can bounce back.
He did extremely well to bounce back from the KO loss to dominate Rios, Bradley and Algeri. I'll be honest, I didn't expect him to.
But now he's took the L to Mayweather, a fight that meant so much and had so much history behind it and to it. So much riding on it and losing it in convincing fashion it can mess a guy up mentally.
We will have to wait and see.
oh man, wake up!Comment
Comment