The Current "man to beat" at 147 is....

[-MEGA-]

Look man ...you are wrong...Get over it. Bradley has beat almost no WW's ...He didn't beat Chaves and He didn't beat Manny...So you're left with Abregu, Rios , Alexander...

There is no man at WW and if there was it would probably be Thurman before Bradley....Didn't he Knock Chaves out ? Did dynamite Tim do that?

Hate guys like you who make me resent fighters I love watching...

Is Thurman even a real champ at 147 yet? Didn't think so.

[PivotandRoll]

Is Thurman even a real champ at 147 yet? Didn't think so.

Oh he didn't beat Jessie Vargas, who got a rip off win over the guy Broner just dismantled, yet Vargas hung with T Brad and almost knocked him out.....hmmm

yeah I don't think I care about a meaningless belt

[-MEGA-]

Oh he didn't beat Jessie Vargas, who got a rip off win over the guy Broner just dismantled, yet Vargas hung with T Brad and almost knocked him out.....hmmm

yeah I don't think I care about a meaningless belt

Ok Vargas>Collazo, how bout that?

For the record I think Thurman should be full champ not whatever they're calling it.

[PivotandRoll]

Ok Vargas>Collazo, how bout that?

For the record I think Thurman should be full champ not whatever they're calling it.

Vargas is not better than Collazo....Would probably get a rip off win if they fought but is not better

[-MEGA-]

Vargas is not better than Collazo....Would probably get a rip off win if they fought but is not better

Lol, what? He sure in the **** is. It maybe only that he is younger and fresher but he's definitely a better opponent at this point. How could you even argue that?

[PivotandRoll]

Lol, what? He sure in the **** is. It maybe only that he is younger and fresher but he's definitely a better opponent at this point. How could you even argue that?

because Collazo has beaten people and Vargas hasn't? Lopez and Khabib arguably beat him ... You are really bending every fact you can to make Bradley seem better.. Not saying I rate Collazo or anything..

[VG_Addict]

because Collazo has beaten people and Vargas hasn't? Lopez and Khabib arguably beat him ... You are really bending every fact you can to make Bradley seem better.. Not saying I rate Collazo or anything..

Who did Collazo beat? Victor Ortiz?

[-MEGA-]

because Collazo has beaten people and Vargas hasn't? Lopez and Khabib arguably beat him ... You are really bending every fact you can to make Bradley seem better.. Not saying I rate Collazo or anything..

I'm not bending the facts. I'm stating them. Your the one doing all the bending and shaping here for the sake of your argument. Collazo is a "barely was, has been" on the verge of retirement (if he hasn't already) At least Vargas is still just a "barely was" and has a lot more years ahead of him.

Vargas>Collazo

[Rip Chudd]

What petty criteria are you talking about?

That you have to beat welterweights to be the best welterweight?

I can always come on here and get a good laugh from Dirk

[Bardock]

Pacquiao has lost three of his last six, including his most recent fight. How in the world can he be the "man to beat" at Welterweight?

Tim Bradley just won a vacant title and is 2-1-1 in his last four fights. How in the world can he be the "man to beat" at Welterweight?

I don't think anybody at Welterweight is the "man to beat" yet. Floyd JUST retired.

BUT, with Keith Thurman and Kell Brook both still undefeated, both having world titles and both at least having made a couple of defenses, there's no doubt they are the guys with the best claims to being champion of the division. Definitely not Pacquiao or Bradley. The WBO title was just thrown in the garbage earlier this year.

Definitely not Thurman with that paper title either