Comments Thread For: Fury: Klitschko's Best Win is a Bottle Job, Mr. Toe Breaker

[Jewish-Reptile]

Lol @ Fury claiming Haye ducked him. Fury ducked Ustinov and Pulev and went really quiet when called out by David Price, the same guy who was flattened by pillow fisted Thompson, no surprise he went quiet again when Thompson called him out.

Dude can not claim anyone ducked anyone, especially when it is intended as an insult. Roll on the 24th of October the sooner Klitschko rolls over Fury he can get down to real business with Wilder for the one belt that continues to elude him.

[sako5]

Mr. Toe Breaker

[kafkod]

In my opinion if you don't believe that Ward is one of the best fighters in the world then its you that is actually lacking any kind of credibility.

I don't believe that Ward is the second best fighter, p4p, in the world, and I think time will prove me right about that.

But the point is that the Ring removed him from their p4p list, then put him right back in at number 2 after he beat Paul Smith.

Seems like they apply the same rules with their p4p rankings as they do with their linear titles. Once you get a ranking, all you have to do is beat anybody, no matter how poor, and you keep it.

That's not a credible system. P4p rankings should be based on recent performances, eg, over the last 2 years. Otherwise, they have no value.

[BTL]

I'd say Chris Byrd was Wlad's best win, not Haye.

that is a very good win, i also think sam peters was a top one.

[////]

What rankings do, then?

i defended rings rankings for longer than most but they really have gone to ****

their last p4p revision is indecipherable gibberish

[Travycat]

Sooooo then who's your best win? A win over a blown-up past his prime cruiserweight that floored you in the 2nd round? This guy is straight diarrhea of the mouth. He only looks outward instead of inward and that's why he'll lose. Fun to listen to him talk, though!

[Ravens Fan]

I don't believe that Ward is the second best fighter, p4p, in the world, and I think time will prove me right about that.

But the point is that the Ring removed him from their p4p list, then put him right back in at number 2 after he beat Paul Smith.

Seems like they apply the same rules with their p4p rankings as they do with their linear titles. Once you get a ranking, all you have to do is beat anybody, no matter how poor, and you keep it.

That's not a credible system. P4p rankings should be based on recent performances, eg, over the last 2 years. Otherwise, they have no value.

Its simple Ring dropped Ward because of inactivity, which they should have, he has since fought and they decided to put him back where they believe he belongs. I would say that it is very debatable where he should be on the P4P list. But in my opinion what isn't debatable is whether or not he belongs on the list because he in fact does. I also believe that the large majority of knowledgeable boxing fans would agree with that.

[kafkod]

Its simple Ring dropped Ward because of inactivity, which they should have, he has since fought and they decided to put him back where they believe he belongs. I would say that it is very debatable where he should be on the P4P list. But in my opinion what isn't debatable is whether or not he belongs on the list because he in fact does. I also believe that the large majority of knowledgeable boxing fans would agree with that.

Ward has beaten 2 opponents in the last 3 years - Edwin Rodriguez and Paul Smith. Think about that for a while.

[thack]

Tyson you are bum ....an old man will more than likely show this ...with his weak jaw ...you are a clown.

[Ravens Fan]

Ward has beaten 2 opponents in the last 3 years - Edwin Rodriguez and Paul Smith. Think about that for a while.

Okay, I thought about it and I still believe, as the Ring does, that Ward is one of the 10 best fighters in the world.