Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wladimir Klitschko is P4P #1 according to the fair and objective BoxRec computer

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
    So wait, Boxrec isn't fair and objective now?
    Yes, BoxRec is fair and objective with the information it's been given, the official results of fights.

    But not necessarily always correct, sometimes the official results are biased, for example robberies like Mayweather-Castillo I.

    Comment


    • So Marciano beat 3 out of the 5 top P4P fighters in history according to Boxrec...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
        Yes, fair and objective with the information it's been given, the official results of fights.

        But not always correct, sometimes the official results are biased, for example robberies like Mayweather-Castillo I.
        So how is it fair and objective then?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
          Does BoxRec being fair and objective mean that it is necessarily correct?
          It can't always be correct, because it can't take something like a robbery (Floyd-Castillo I) into consideration.

          And there are other factors the computer may not know, like someone paying off USADA to ignore cheating and forgiving illegal IV injections.

          But yes, the BoxRec computer IS fair and objective with the information (official results) that it has been given.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
            Yes.

            That's the boxer Mayweather and Khan avoided.
            Kell Brook has 1 good win. Everything else is filler. His career is Wilder-esque.

            That's harsh actually no one's resume is worse than Wilders.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              So how is it fair and objective then?


              The computer IS fair and objective with the information it's been given: THE OFFICIAL RESULTS.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Freedom. View Post


                The computer IS fair and objective with the information it's been given: THE OFFICIAL RESULTS.
                So in that case the rankings arent fair nor objective then.

                So that's settled.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
                  It can't always be correct, because it can't take something like a robbery (Floyd-Castillo I) into consideration.

                  And there are other factors the computer may not know, like someone paying off USADA to ignore cheating and forgiving illegal IV injections.

                  But yes, the BoxRec computer IS fair and objective with the information (official results) that it has been given.
                  What a change of tune

                  Comment


                  • Henry Cooper greater than Bob Fitzsimmons and Vitali Klitschko.

                    Comment


                    • ...how is Khan rated higher than Danny Garcia?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP