Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Real King Kong]

Okay

I'm glad we can at least agree on that. Maybe you're not quite as dumb as everyone says.

[Spoon23]

I'm glad we can at least agree on that. Maybe you're not quite as dumb as everyone says.

Lol fl0mo ******s thinking It. Only shows to everyone how butt hurt they are

Shows I am getting under their skin, and apparently the truth is slowly sinking in. Including to you.

What is actually dumb is to conclude Pac was taking peds just by the size of the head alone with no supporting facts to back it up sheeeesh..

[Zaroku]

[QUOTE=considerthis;16541437]

What's even more disappointing of all of this was Floyd's ped iv scandal. He was already amped up to the gills, and still he still had to ran and hug around the ring like a lost puppy.

But the most disappointing of all is that with all that peds in his system, he still produced the least punch output of his whole career.. Really sad to know this.. tsk tsk tsk..

Spoon loves that dong jerking emoticon... Probably has experience

[Zaroku]

Yup even when he can't feed himself properly and was very much malnourished when he was a kid. He still had a big head.

He must have used his money for PED Than to eat once or twice a day in his poverty stricken state.. Tsk tsk tsk..

So is that why he can't even lie good.. Poor brain development as a kid growing up??

Not enough protein can do that..

[Zaroku]

I'm glad we can at least agree on that. Maybe you're not quite as dumb as everyone says.

Wrong!! He shifts the burden of proof..

The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) in the United States is the imperative on a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will shift the conclusion away from the default position to one's own position.

The burden of proof is often associated with the Latin maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the best translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[1]

She or he who does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption, meaning (s)he needs no evidence to support her or his claim. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.

[Spoon23]

So is that why he can't even lie good.. Poor brain development as a kid growing up??

Not enough protein can do that..

Yeah maybe, Bradley though has a bigger dome. He must have it worst than manny.

Bradley's PED must be stronger. he's head is bigger. Huge!

[original zero]

how many times is he going to write TRANSAPRENCY (sic) ?

[Zaroku]

Yeah maybe, Bradley though has a bigger dome. He must have it worst than manny.

Bradley's PED must be stronger. he's head is bigger. Huge!

Not talking about head size... Talking about brain development, from lack of proper nutrition.

[travestyny]

So now your saying after he got IVS. Floyd urine tested right after the IV treatment

Idiot, 750 ml IVS with Saline and vitamins is enough to mask whatever peds Froid has in his system, moreover, The shorter time for him to take the test which you said is even right after the IV treatment, is even better, since it fuvks up the body composition of an athletes in a snap, since it shoots up straight through the viens. Tsk tsk tsk..

You are all over the place.

Maybe if Floyd takes a dump over and over before and after the weigh-in and pisses abnormally. Those saline masking agent won't work wonders anymore, but that's far fetched lol

- class dismissed again (since I opened a remedial class for idiots.)

Do you realize how much of an idiot you are? You can't even decide if he was taking PED's through the IV or he was masking through the IV. Which was it? He can't be doing both, can he?

Didn't I just show you that the masking effect wouldn't last past 2 hours? What did you have to say about that? Oh yea, you DEFLECTED to something else. Just bow down, b*tch. You have no idea what you are talking about.

[travestyny]

no takers from genius floyd fans?

I told you I'd gladly prove you wrong on this. Just step up and let's make a wager. If I prove you wrong, you stop commenting on the IV scenario. If I can't, then you name your own penalty. Deal?

Step up, boy.

But you should be aware that you have no proof that the IV was administered at 7:45pm. Don't you agree that you misunderstood what Zero was saying? If you have proof that the IV was administered at that time, let it be known.

I'm trying to be fair to you. Let's get that out of the way first, then I'll make you feel like a clown about the rest of your statement.