Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Boxing simply isn't news. Congress has been out of session and they have been having hearings on steroid abuse in boxing this year. Just wait they have been gift basketed the cause they were looking for by the NSAC.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
      USADA has historically been recognized as the worlds leading anti-doping authority. However, my experiences to date with them have been less than acceptable and less than professional, said Bob Bennett, the executive director of the Nevada commission.

      He cannot have it done at his house and [USADA] cant authorize it.... I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a the****utic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada, Bennett said. USADA never told us prior to the IV that they had their own TUE, and they never kept us informed about it being administered.

      If they think they can do what they want, where and whenever they want in the state of Nevada, they are grossly mistaken.

      Bennett and Aguilar said despite USADA's involvement in 45 boxing cards and their supervision of the Ultimate Fighting Championships anti-doping system, the agency has botched communication on three occasions.

      "After three incidents here, its hard to call this an anomaly" Bennett said. They need to understand they need to honor the rules of Nevada, or their work will not be recognized in Nevada.


      Straight from the NSAC's mouth.

      http://www.latimes.com/sports/sports...910-story.html
      ^

      This

      Anyone who thinks nsac is a clean organization as well should know they need to be investigated as well.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
        The dates of the filings are evidence. You need to learn your rules of law.
        The date the TUE was granted =/= the date they were notified. Do you even know anything about this case?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by IR0NFIST View Post
          What exactly would those reasons be? As far as I'm concerned, if they were willing to release the dates, then it would only make sense for them to release the number of tests as well.
          Again, no anti-doping agency in the world releases results publicly in general. If they do, as in USADA's case, it is because they are being generous. VADA has never released any results publicly in such detail, not even once.

          There's lots of reasons, I won't do the homework for you though. But here's a couple. One reason is because it's none of the public's business. Only the business of the relevant parties. Second, it protects them from unnecessary criticism.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
            USADA has been caught lying in the past. Put a USADA representative in front of a jury and not a single juror would believe him after they learn about the Morales incident. Testimony is only worth as much as the credibility of the who makes the statement. USADA lost any and all credibility when they lied about Morales failed drug tests.
            So you believe USADA is lying about knowing beforehand about the IV, but you believe them when they say Mayweather used an IV. So basically, you believe they are telling truth only when it's convenient to any nonsensical agenda you have in mind.

            It was USADA that released the information originally about the IV, and they didn't even have to do that. Information released since May.

            Comment


            • Arum and Pacquiao knew about this since May, yet it wasnt worth their time to discuss. It never became a thing until that phaggot hauser made a big deal about it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                So...........
                So you have 2 different stories coming from the NSAC. Which is accurate and why did they change their tune?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
                  USADA has historically been recognized as the worlds leading anti-doping authority. However, my experiences to date with them have been less than acceptable and less than professional, said Bob Bennett, the executive director of the Nevada commission.

                  He cannot have it done at his house and [USADA] cant authorize it.... I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a the****utic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada, Bennett said. USADA never told us prior to the IV that they had their own TUE, and they never kept us informed about it being administered.

                  If they think they can do what they want, where and whenever they want in the state of Nevada, they are grossly mistaken.

                  Bennett and Aguilar said despite USADA's involvement in 45 boxing cards and their supervision of the Ultimate Fighting Championships anti-doping system, the agency has botched communication on three occasions.

                  "After three incidents here, its hard to call this an anomaly" Bennett said. They need to understand they need to honor the rules of Nevada, or their work will not be recognized in Nevada.


                  Straight from the NSAC's mouth.

                  http://www.latimes.com/sports/sports...910-story.html

                  NSAC doesnt have to issue an exemption for the IV, since it wasnt in violation of their rules in the first place. It was against USADA/WADA rules, so how would they grant an exception for someone elses rules?


                  NSAC makes no sense here.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by el*** View Post
                    Arum and Pacquiao knew about this since May, yet it wasnt worth their time to discuss. It never became a thing until that phaggot hauser made a big deal about it.
                    They weren't allowed to discuss it as part of some agreement they signed.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                      The date the TUE was granted =/= the date they were notified. Do you even know anything about this case?
                      We have USADA informing NSAC on May 21st of a retroactive TUE being granted. You do understand the meaning of the word retroactive dont you? We also know that the TUE was applied for on May 19th.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP