Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[GTTofAK]

c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive TUE; or [Comment to 4.3(c): Such Athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out at Article 4.1, in case an application for a retroactive TUE is necessary following Sample collection.

See here is the problem with your answer. It references other code that you didn't post. The retroactive TUE still has to be in compliance with the the rules set forth for a standard TUE.

One of those requirements is that there be

4.1
A TUE will be granted only in strict accordance with the following criteria:

a. The Athlete would experience a significant impairment to health if
the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method were to be withheld in the course of treating an acute or chronic medical condition.

b. The The****utic Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method would produce no additional enhancement of performance other than that which might be anticipated by a return to a state of normal health following the treatment of a legitimate medical condition. The Use of any Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method to increase “low-normal” levels of any endogenous hormone is not considered an acceptable The****utic intervention.

c. There is no reasonable The****utic alternative to the Use of the otherwise Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.

d. The necessity for the Use of the otherwise Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method cannot be a consequence, wholly or in part, of the prior Use, without a TUE, of a substance or method which was prohibited at the time of Use.

https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws....ry-2012_EN.pdf

Look at the bolded part. There can be no reasonable the****utic alternative. In the case of IV rehydration WADA has explicitly said that IV rehydration for mild to moderate dehydration is not a valid method for a TUE because oral rehydration is a reasonable the****utic alternative.

The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion.
(Ref: 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16)

See that no TUE for the treatment of mild to moderate dehydration ever. Froid and USADA have no leg to stand on. IV treatment for moderate to mild rehydration is not eligible for a TUE because it is not the only the****utic option.

[Zaroku]

You still part of this thread? You making yourself look bad by being here?

The answers are you looking for, find them yourself.

Thanks. For course correction.

[Slip Stream]

Angry sadness tormenting their very existence.

As boogerman and silver surfer dude, are the only 2 votes in the polls who believes he really was cleaning up the sport


Cries of joy so they say.. So transparent are their battle cry that they look like cliffhangers wanting to be saved by Floyd for showing their loyal to the very end.

Cries of joy turned cries of sadness as no one believes their irrational mind.


Cries of injustice resonating in the depths of Floyd's diehard minions soul calling for mercy..

Leave Floyd alone!!

Lack of creativity getting you down or is it the dead end witch hunt? Floyd doesn't need to be left alone, he is being left alone. He's retired dude, get over it, and Manny is one step behind him. Here's something that might be constructive, since propping the Pac Man up was all too easy by you and the zombie elite, just fixate on another fighter's crotch and you should be a okay.

The day I see Floyd granting interviews denying PED usage, in a sweat because of PED claims, or being tried for alleged PEDs then I will believe there is a real outcry. But until that day does come, it's a few nuts at Boxingscene carrying the torch for a fighter who has no idea what political party he's in (and he's presumably helping run his country)....

you evaded my questions real well ha ha ha...

as you will, and i quote "keep scouring the net too though, you'll need help finding something to destroy the hated Mayweather."

i say the First Take i gave is ok and you go find the others....at least i gave you one...can you give me one link to a document proving floyd was really severely dehydrated to warrant an iv?

if the "hated mayweather", you said that not me..be destroyed, don't look far for who destroyed him. floyd is at the center of all this.....

Why would I provide a link to a non-story? That's pretty ******ed. I would provide such a link if the story of the IV had the remotest resonance outside of the Floyd fanaticism in this thread. Floyd isn't in a court of law but the burden of proof lies with the accuser, and Hauser isn't even really accusing, he's asking his readers to extrapolate something he doesn't actually know himself.

There is no story....

oh he is crying now

Nothing new, witty, or pertinent here huh? Okay, carry on....

[DeadLikeMe]

The TUE was granted and has been approved by all relevant parties. There's a reason nobody like Roach or Arum remotely cares about this. It's only an issue to heartbroken kids crying themselves to sleep each night, clutching their manny dolls.

[Slip Stream]

The TUE was granted and has been approved by all relevant parties. There's a reason nobody like Roach or Arum remotely cares about this. It's only an issue to heartbroken kids crying themselves to sleep each night, clutching their manny dolls.

And ejaculating into old socks....

[boxinghead530]

Thanks. For course correction.

Whatever fanboy. Lol

[Rath]

Lack of creativity getting you down or is it the dead end witch hunt? Floyd doesn't need to be left alone, he is being left alone. He's retired dude, get over it, and Manny is one step behind him. Here's something that might be constructive, since propping the Pac Man up was all too easy by you and the zombie elite, just fixate on another fighter's crotch and you should be a okay.

The day I see Floyd granting interviews denying PED usage, in a sweat because of PED claims, or being tried for alleged PEDs then I will believe there is a real outcry. But until that day does come, it's a few nuts at Boxingscene carrying the torch for a fighter who has no idea what political party he's in (and he's presumably helping run his country)....



Why would I provide a link to a non-story? That's pretty ******ed. I would provide such a link if the story of the IV had the remotest resonance outside of the Floyd fanaticism in this thread. Floyd isn't in a court of law but the burden of proof lies with the accuser, and Hauser isn't even really accusing, he's asking his readers to extrapolate something he doesn't actually know himself.

There is no story....



Nothing new, witty, or pertinent here huh? Okay, carry on....

you want witty remarks?

you said vagina stimulates you not witty remarks.

[Rath]

The TUE was granted and has been approved by all relevant parties. There's a reason nobody like Roach or Arum remotely cares about this. It's only an issue to heartbroken kids crying themselves to sleep each night, clutching their manny dolls.

and that proves Floyd cleaned up the sports?

it is not just the IV scandal that was exposed here.

it is also how Floyd fans treat PEDs situations.

the crusade for cleaning up the sports.

Floyd fans - Hauser has no reputation/credibility just because he said Haymon should be hanged

Floyd fans - Floyd has all the reputation and credibility no matter what he say or do.

see deadbrainlikeyou?

that is what it's all about:

IV, Floyd crusade, and Floyd fans sound judgement.

[Rath]

And ejaculating into old socks....

.. and you want a witty reply?

[Slip Stream]

[/B]

you want witty remarks?

you said vagina stimulates you not witty remarks.

I didn't say anything about "stimulative," substantive is what I'm getting at.