Originally posted by SugarKaineHook
View Post
Look, tell me this. If Floyd had a severe enough medical condition (oops, I said the words) that required medical assistance and an IV had to be used to inject a substance into Floyd, do you not think that the NSAC wants to know about all that being that it occurred so close to the fight?
Secondly, there is another section that brings up injections. So there are 2 sections on the form that Floyd had to divulge to NSAC but did not.
As for your definition, it appears that you are confused and thinking about chronic medical conditions(or illness) but what Floyd supposedly had was an acute medical condition. Furthermore, if you agree with me that Floyd did NOT have a medical condition then you are agreeing with me that he never required an IV in the first place!!! Its your call.
"A biological or psychological state which is within the range of normal human variation is not a medical condition"
"Acute care is a branch of secondary health care where a patient receives active but short-term treatment for a severe injury or episode of illness, an urgent medical condition, or during recovery from surgery.[1][2] In medical terms, care for acute health conditions is the opposite from chronic care, or longer term care"
.
Comment