Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[radioraheem]

I have not alleged the USADA will forge documentation only that they have issued false statements in the past. Furthermore Floyd is also on tape admitting to taking the IV. This is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

You are not that smart please trying to pretend that you are smart. You are not you are ******. The Spartans would have thrown your dumbass off the mountain.

Mayweather mentioned the IV well after the fact, well after the information was originally released. That's why he was questioned about it.

USADA originally released the information to the media about the IV. USADA informed NSAC about the IV before telling the media. And USADA also told Team Pacquiao about the IV.

Keep owning yourself.

[Rath]

raheem, you and boogie's contention was the released dates of USADA testing was only for the date test took place and not how many samples were taken right?

how come when Pac said 4 vials of blood were taken by USADA you said he was lying because you said they only take two table spoon full of blood.

[GTTofAK]

Mayweather mentioned the IV well after the fact, well after the information was originally released. That's why he was questioned about it.

Oh you poor dumbass. By admitting to the use Mayweather has already proven it. Its called motive to lie. You are simply to ****** to grasp such simple concepts. I feel for your parents. No parent should have to put up with a kids as ****** as you.

[radioraheem]

Oh you poor dumbass. By admitting to the use Mayweather has already proven it. Its called motive to lie. You are simply to ****** to grasp such simple concepts. I feel for your parents. No parent should have to put up with a kids as ****** as you.

Again, where is this information that supports the IV other than USADA originally? USADA originally released the information, not Mayweather.

[GTTofAK]

Again, where is this information that supports the IV other than USADA originally? USADA originally released the information, not Mayweather.

And if Mayweather had denied it you may have had an argument. But he confirmed it. Furthermore in the context of the existence of the IV USADA has no motive to lie. Its a very simple legal concept that you seem to be unable of grasping because you were born ******.

[Rath]

Again, where is this information that supports the IV other than USADA originally? USADA originally released the information, not Mayweather.

when exactly did USADA released the info of that Floyd performed IV transfusion?

on hour after they found out?

a day?

after the fight?

whom did they informed first the public or NSAC

when did NSAC found out about all this IV stuff?

[radioraheem]

And if Mayweather had denied it you may have had an argument. But he confirmed it. Furthermore in the context of the existence of the IV USADA has no motive to lie. Its a very simple legal concept that you seem to be unable of grasping because you were born ******.

Yes, Mayweather confirmed it. So again, where is your original source of evidence other than USADA? Mayweather is well after the fact once reporters knew via USADA and thereby questioned him.

[GTTofAK]

Yes, Mayweather confirmed it. So again, where is your original source of evidence other than USADA? Mayweather is well after the fact once reporters knew via USADA and thereby questioned him.

You really have gotten lost in your head haven't you. Hey let me take your logic one step furter.

USADA told the press that only Morales A sample had tested positive. Then it came out that both the A and B samples had tested positive twice. But who tested the samples? USADA. So in order to believe that Morales' A and B samples had tested positive you have to trust USADA. Therefore, you have to trust that their statement that only the A sample tested positive. So USADA didn't lie.

BOOOM!!! Now pass that ****ing joint.

You do realize that your arguments only make logical sense to someone who is ****ing wasted.

[radioraheem]

You really have gotten lost in your head have you. Hey let me take your logic one step furter.

USADA told the press that only Morales A sample had tested positive. Then it came out that both the A and B samples had tested positive twice. But who tested the samples? USADA. So in order to believe that Morales' A and B samples had tested positive you have to trust USADA. Therefore, you have to trust that their statement that only the A sample tested positive. So USADA didn't lie.

BOOOM!!! Now pass that ducking joint.

You do realize that your arguments only make logical sense to someone who is ****ing wasted.

Oh so now we've backtracked into Morales huh?

What happened to that supporting evidence outside USADA? You don't got it right?

[torosboxing75]

750ml!!! I had to lose 3.5 lbs in one month. I was dehydrated. LMAO!!!