Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • !! Shawn
    !! Shown
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 9810
    • 670
    • 724
    • 31,455

    #671
    Originally posted by radioraheem
    Which goes back to my point of permission. With permission, it is allowed and legal.
    There is no permission, there is meeting a set of requirements, such as being hospitalized, as part of surgery, or inpatient care. All of them require admission to a hospital.

    Its not if you ask, and get an okay, we will let you engage in practices that our rules clearly state have no valid purpose other than to mask performance enhancing drugs.

    Comment

    • Vasyl’s dad
      He said no rematch
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 23510
      • 1,120
      • 1,945
      • 50,072

      #672
      Originally posted by !! Shawn
      I know you love Floyd man, but you should try and be objective about things like rules, that are clearly written and not subject to much interpretation.

      Its very very clearly stated why IV rehydration is not allowed. Its also very clearly stated the exemption circumstances.

      Floyd met none of the exemption circumstances.

      Yet Floyd was given an exemption, after the fact.
      Floyd fans only care about fairness when floyd tells them to.

      Comment

      • radioraheem
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 5915
        • 165
        • 200
        • 12,234

        #673
        Originally posted by !! Shawn
        I know you love Floyd man, but you should try and be objective about things like rules, that are clearly written and not subject to much interpretation.

        Its very very clearly stated why IV rehydration is not allowed. Its also very clearly stated the exemption circumstances.

        Floyd met none of the exemption circumstances.

        Yet Floyd was given an exemption, after the fact.
        If given permission, it is legal.

        Now if you want to argue that there should be no such thing as permission or exemptions regardless of circumstance, then that's another subject. Because that's currently not the case.

        Comment

        • imperial1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 1541
          • 48
          • 0
          • 7,826

          #674
          Originally posted by radioraheem
          If given permission, it is legal.

          Now if you want to argue that there should be no such thing as permission or exemptions regardless of circumstance, then that's another subject. Because that's currently not the case.
          Your really trying to play that gray area aren't you ,you know dam well the amount of fluids used WAS NOT LEGAL nor the IV administered at home was ..

          Comment

          • hectari
            Power to the People
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2005
            • 22896
            • 1,430
            • 768
            • 131,802

            #675
            Originally posted by radioraheem
            If given permission, it is legal.

            Now if you want to argue that there should be no such thing as permission or exemptions regardless of circumstance, then that's another subject. Because that's currently not the case.
            Okay its good you know you need permission, now explain why Floyd did it without PERMISSION.

            Comment

            • pasawayako
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 15348
              • 639
              • 194
              • 151,963

              #676
              Originally posted by Golden Boi 360
              I think most of these people calling Floyd a "cheater/roider/armstrong" are just trolling and rustling jimmies.

              They probably know Floyd did nothing wrong but it's too much fun lol
              Or the opposite. I am 101% sure that froid is using peds i will be surprise to see if anyone is not thinking that floyd is not on peds. I think most of floyd fans now feels the same.

              Comment

              • ADP02
                Champ
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 13617
                • 415
                • 1
                • 26,360

                #677
                Originally posted by radioraheem
                If given permission, it is legal.
                This statement is so funny in so many ways.

                You are trying to help Floyd get away with doing something illegal, I see. How come?

                What happened to the radioraheem that first wanted to see proof like you demanded from Manny Pacquiao?
                Did you look for links where Floyd got permission from the commissions?
                Did you request to see clear evidence that Floyd was actually dehydrated to the point that he had to get 750ml from an IV?


                Manny had surgery yet you and most Floyd fans were su****ious and wanted to see more evidence. Yet for Floyd, you Floyd fans are not demanding for any evidence. NONE! How come?

                Comment

                • radioraheem
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 5915
                  • 165
                  • 200
                  • 12,234

                  #678
                  Originally posted by hectari
                  Okay its good you know you need permission, now explain why Floyd did it without PERMISSION.
                  He got permission via USADA. But according to NSAC, they want to be the ones who have power in who gets permission. If Floyd went to NSAC, I'm quite sure they'd given him the permission. It's unlikely they would've rejected, especially considering it was saline and multivitamins.

                  If you really want to go down the route of PED use, you might as well follow Victor Conte's theory. Conte doesn't believe Mayweather was masking anything. Rather, he thinks if Mayweather is using PEDs, he's doing outside of competition when he's not getting randomly tested. So when he does start getting randomly tested for training camp, it's all out of his system and clean.

                  Comment

                  • radioraheem
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 5915
                    • 165
                    • 200
                    • 12,234

                    #679
                    Originally posted by ADP02
                    This statement is so funny in so many ways.

                    You are trying to help Floyd get away with doing something illegal, I see. How come?

                    What happened to the radioraheem that first wanted to see proof like you demanded from Manny Pacquiao?
                    Did you look for links where Floyd got permission from the commissions?
                    Did you request to see clear evidence that Floyd was actually dehydrated to the point that he had to get 750ml from an IV?

                    Manny had surgery yet you and most Floyd fans were su****ious and wanted to see more evidence. Yet for Floyd, you Floyd fans are not demanding for any evidence. NONE! How come?
                    It appears that Mayweather has already gotten away with it. Also with Mayweather, his tests came back negative. NSAC isn't going to do anything, and you know this. Just like NSAC isn't going to do anything to Pacquiao.

                    And no, Mayweather didn't get permission from NSAC. He got permission via USADA (USADA had the power to give permission, which is also a conflict since NSAC only wants to be the granter of permission). Which is also why I feel NSAC should take over the random drug testing so there's less mess. There's no need to get permission from USADA, and then get permission from NSAC. NSAC may say something is fine, but then USADA says NO. Or vice-versa. NSAC is correct when they say the process is confusing fighters.

                    Comment

                    • !! Shawn
                      !! Shown
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 9810
                      • 670
                      • 724
                      • 31,455

                      #680
                      Originally posted by radioraheem
                      If given permission, it is legal.

                      Now if you want to argue that there should be no such thing as permission or exemptions regardless of circumstance, then that's another subject. Because that's currently not the case.
                      Your fanboy goggles usually cloud your judgement.

                      USADA clearly violated their own policy in granting Mayweather an exemption. It is not really an arguable point.

                      The criteria for receiving an exemption are quite clearly stated, and Floyd met none of them.

                      Some food for thought though. USADA appears to be contracted as the sole testing provider for the PBC.

                      They also appear to have deviated from their own regulations in Floyds favor.

                      Usually if you follow the money trail you get to the truth.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP