But actually, no they didn't. They did not deny learning about the IV on the day it was being administered, they did not deny that WADA prohibits IV infusions, they did not deny that they can be used to mask substance abuse, they did not deny that the TUE was granted retroactively after the fight, they did not deny that they did not contact NSAC or Pac's team until after the fight. Literally 0 points from 1-7 have been responded to. Did you even read USADA's response?
True, no one could claim with any certainty that the IV was serving a purpose other than rehydrating but everything about how it was handled stinks something bad and adds to already lingering doubts about USADA.
EDIT: But that being said, one would expect USADA to put the burden of proof on Mayweather's team. I wonder if they will respond with why Mayweather was granted the TUE, and why they were ok with handling the process so slowly. Normally, even just being in possession of or improperly using a banned substance in such a way that no actual competitive advantage is gained would be grounds for an immediate response as per USADA's own rules.
True, no one could claim with any certainty that the IV was serving a purpose other than rehydrating but everything about how it was handled stinks something bad and adds to already lingering doubts about USADA.
EDIT: But that being said, one would expect USADA to put the burden of proof on Mayweather's team. I wonder if they will respond with why Mayweather was granted the TUE, and why they were ok with handling the process so slowly. Normally, even just being in possession of or improperly using a banned substance in such a way that no actual competitive advantage is gained would be grounds for an immediate response as per USADA's own rules.
Comment