Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
    "he took the additional step of applying for a TUE after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program." -USADA statement

    well there should have not been any additional step in the first place, because that rehydration method as they claim isnt allowed under the WADA code if we refer to the hauser report that says..
    "More specifically, the 2015 WADA ***8220;Prohibited Substances and Methods List***8221; states, ***8220;Intravenous infusions and/or injections of more than 50 ml per 6 hour period are prohibited except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures, or clinical investigations.***8221;

    if the criteria for the exception was there, then the scenario would be that floyd needing medical attention, in a medical facility hooked up with an IV line not at home getting IV infusion being monitored by a USADA staff.

    OR

    the IV line should be hooked up for about 3-4 days (because the amount of solution present during the home infusion was 750ml) if they follow the WADA protocol.


    https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws....ons_4.0_en.pdf

    Look at table 2 on page 7. "Requirements for a TUE when the infusion is NOT given during a hospital
    admission, surgical procedure or clinical investigation. "

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
      are you floyd stans for real? you will defend him over everything, stop being a thick idiot, stop that right now. I demand you show basic human intelligence, you deserve to be put down.

      Usada caught him in the act, he was doing it in secret, even a fckn monkey can tell that, do you really think since he was trying to hide it from everyone, only fessed up after being caught and then kept it hidden with usada until after the fight means he is not hiding something?

      of course he is a cheat, like you all said before to a certain fighter, it is common sense

      are you also going to sit on your fat jobless ass and say he only did it once? fk off out of here you mentally challenged simpleton .

      Of course he did it before, it hides peds, so of course previous tests would have been all ok for him, as posted before, ts levels are lower than the average man, by almost a half, a clear indication of manipulation and now this, the same method armstrong did before tests to hide his Peds.

      his legacy is tarnished, imagine if pac was caught doing this, you lot would have been all over him, hell you are adamant he is guilty just because a few crackheads claim him to be

      at least floyds failed tests are proven too now, as soon as he failed with mistakes, usada gave him a waiver

      Raging
      being paranoid
      lashing out with violence

      all clear signs of peds, you need to go get yourself some education with the rubbish you are posting, how did you even turn your computer on

      i
      Moron getting angry because he's out of the loop.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
        https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws....ons_4.0_en.pdf

        Look at table 2 on page 7. "Requirements for a TUE when the infusion is NOT given during a hospital
        admission, surgical procedure or clinical investigation. "
        yeah thats why its a prohibited method without TUE. which they applied for after doing it.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
          yeah thats why its a prohibited method without TUE. which they applied for after doing it.
          Read the statement by USADA, he asked for permission and was granted it.


          An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

          a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

          b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

          c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
          http://www.usada.org/substances/tue/policy/
          Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 09-12-2015, 06:47 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
            Read the statement by USADA, he asked for permission and was granted it.
            yeah...no dates, weird coming from an official statement.

            this doesnt raise a red flag to you?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
              yeah thats why its a prohibited method without TUE. which they applied for after doing it.
              According to Hauser, not USADA. Still waiting for him to prove that claim.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
                yeah...no dates, weird coming from an official statement.

                this doesnt raise a red flag to you?
                The statement says "prior to" having the IV.

                What date other than the date he had the IV could it have been?

                "i'm going to be dehydrated 30 days from now can i have a TUE"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                  According to Hauser, not USADA. Still waiting for him to prove that claim.
                  fair enough, but its on USADA to disprove this. they're not the issuing office of TUEs.

                  Comment


                  • lol 14 times the limit yet excuses for him

                    humanity has failed here

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
                      fair enough, but its on USADA to disprove this. they're not the issuing office of TUEs.
                      Yes they are, they issue their own TUES nobody else does it. The problem is nobody applied for an NSAC TUE.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP