Originally posted by DblLFThooK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Thurman: Bad Shoulder or Not, Pacquiao Would've Lost!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Red Cyclone View PostIsn't that the same with Floyd Mayweather Vs Castillo 1?
Bad shoulder or not the same result would have happened because the judges were clearly all biased and in favour of only wanting Floyd to win...
An Injury can't change the outcome?
Riiighttt......
Comment
-
FIomos work with the premise that Floyd can't lose...but he's lost to Castillo for sure and has had a few debatables...
NO sense in arguing with grown men who have feelings for other grown men...
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snoopy91765 View PostLol PAC tards. Mayweather made pAcquiao miss around 400 times and that broke Mandy's shoulder.
You came and you took without giving,
But I sent you away.
Oh Manny well,
Checkhook you and stopped you from feinting,
And I UD'd you today,
Oh Manny
Comment
-
Originally posted by MisanthropicNY View PostFIomos work with the premise that Floyd can't lose...but he's lost to Castillo for sure and has had a few debatables...
NO sense in arguing with grown men who have feelings for other grown men...
Comment
-
I am appalled and really getting the d0uche chills from these Mayweather fans acting all high and mighty believing Floyd "took him to school" and performed a "masterclass".
First off I agree. Pac is not going to be able to beat Floyd when Floyd takes the spineless gameplan of stealing rounds and doing everything in his power to avoid any sort of altercation. Even if that means running from post to post when Pac gets in range to start throwing. I mean to think after all that defensive punching, which was really more smoke and mirrors then clean landed blows, Floyd actually had the gall to take round 12 off in the BIGGEST FIGHT IN HISTORY.
Pacquiao is a puncher boxer, most true boxers and even counter punchers dish it out, fighting for their own legacy and looking to best themselves. Floyd though goes out and like with Pacquiao, fights a no substance fight and takes very few chances that are far between. I don't know how anyone can defend this. This was the FIGHT OF THE CENTURY! With two of the best P4P fighters ever! If fighting a completely defensive fight; using excessive foot work, holding and using your forearms while throwing the bare minimum is working so well.........then he should have pressed the offensive. We didn't see Mayweather "beat Manny's @ss" like some nuthuggers say on here. What we saw was that Floyd was able to run and stay out of the pocket enough to avoid taking on Pacquiao's superior offense. But here is one of the more glaring disappointments, Pacquiao is naturally the smaller guy. When Pacquiao fought most full fledged welterweights, every single one brought something to the table to try and beat Pacquiao. None came outright into the fight looking to run and hold. I mean can you imagine how much of a greater chance all of these guys who fought Pacquiao would have had at beating him if they just tried to steal rounds by using fleeting survival tactics! Can you imagine how much of an easier time Morales and Marquez would of had if they backed up all night, running in survival mode!? Floyd Mayweather, the guy who has completely disregarded Pacquiao, "the midget", for years showed his true colors that night. Not that it wasn't something we already knew. As a whole though boxing fans were disappointed because this was it, this was the fight to end all fights. The biggest fight ever that has squared Mayweather and Pacquiao up against each other. Boxing fans were hopeful that this would be the fight where Mayweather would be looking for that big win and really give everything he had; to really take Pacquiao on. But no. Floyd does what he does best, abusing the rules of boxing to spinelessly steal rounds.
Oh and by the way, a lot of people would disagree with the notion that Floyd won. His ring theatrics with his punch output were largely blocked and barely had any affect of Pacquiao. However Pacquiao's quick punches in the duration of the fight went unseen by most commentators. Not only that but Pacquiao's punches were sharper, more accurate, and had more power behind them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by creekrat77 View PostI am appalled and really getting the d0uche chills from these Mayweather fans acting all high and mighty believing Floyd "took him to school" and performed a "masterclass".
First off I agree. Pac is not going to be able to beat Floyd when Floyd takes the spineless gameplan of stealing rounds and doing everything in his power to avoid any sort of altercation. Even if that means running from post to post when Pac gets in range to start throwing. I mean to think after all that defensive punching, which was really more smoke and mirrors then clean landed blows, Floyd actually had the gall to take round 12 off in the BIGGEST FIGHT IN HISTORY.
Pacquiao is a puncher boxer, most true boxers and even counter punchers dish it out, fighting for their own legacy and looking to best themselves. Floyd though goes out and like with Pacquiao, fights a no substance fight and takes very few chances that are far between. I don't know how anyone can defend this. This was the FIGHT OF THE CENTURY! With two of the best P4P fighters ever! If fighting a completely defensive fight; using excessive foot work, holding and using your forearms while throwing the bare minimum is working so well.........then he should have pressed the offensive. We didn't see Mayweather "beat Manny's @ss" like some nuthuggers say on here. What we saw was that Floyd was able to run and stay out of the pocket enough to avoid taking on Pacquiao's superior offense. But here is one of the more glaring disappointments, Pacquiao is naturally the smaller guy. When Pacquiao fought most full fledged welterweights, every single one brought something to the table to try and beat Pacquiao. None came outright into the fight looking to run and hold. I mean can you imagine how much of a greater chance all of these guys who fought Pacquiao would have had at beating him if they just tried to steal rounds by using fleeting survival tactics! Can you imagine how much of an easier time Morales and Marquez would of had if they backed up all night, running in survival mode!? Floyd Mayweather, the guy who has completely disregarded Pacquiao, "the midget", for years showed his true colors that night. Not that it wasn't something we already knew. As a whole though boxing fans were disappointed because this was it, this was the fight to end all fights. The biggest fight ever that has squared Mayweather and Pacquiao up against each other. Boxing fans were hopeful that this would be the fight where Mayweather would be looking for that big win and really give everything he had; to really take Pacquiao on. But no. Floyd does what he does best, abusing the rules of boxing to spinelessly steal rounds.
Oh and by the way, a lot of people would disagree with the notion that Floyd won. His ring theatrics with his punch output were largely blocked and barely had any affect of Pacquiao. However Pacquiao's quick punches in the duration of the fight went unseen by most commentators. Not only that but Pacquiao's punches were sharper, more accurate, and had more power behind them.
If Manny is such a great fighter why did he suck at fighting so much he couldn't counter Floyd's tactics that night?
Comment
Comment