Which of These Two Fighters do You Have Ranked Higher All-Time RIGHT NOW?

[Johnwoo8686]

Marquez was only 34 when he fought Pacquiao, another lie to you.
Barrera was 29, won against Morales and Ayala after his defeat with PAcquao. Past Prime Wahahaha.

Of course you wouldnt see it, the camera was not there when the knockdown happens, but the commentators saw it and slowmo vid confirmed it. The slowmo showed it was clear knockdown and the ref made a mistake. Keep lying to yourself though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8S5upDGK1Q
14:10 the knockdown,

Go on live in your fantasy world.

LOL so 34 is now prime? When Floyd fought De La Hoya at 34 you guys said that was passed prime but when Pacquiao faces a 34 year old he is now prime? LOL at the hypocrisy.

Barrera may have been 29 but with almost 60 fights and coming off of several wars that is not prime. He was already talking about retirement.

[Johnwoo8686]

Barrera, Marquez, & Cotto weren't prime? Are you r*tarded?

No they weren't. Two of those dudes came off brutal wars when Manny fought them and the other one Manny couldn't convincingly beat with 4 tries.

[Shpacman]

None of the opponents you listed for Manny were in their prime either. Which is partially the reason why Floyd has more title fights. Floyd beat more guys while they were still title holders than Manny has.

By what stanndarts they were not in their prime? Only Cotto and Morales may be considered to be little bit out of prime.

[Don Pichardo]

B-Hop too.

Off topic but since you brought it up in your own thread I would put b hop above floyd in all time list. And that's not taking anything away from Floyd. But b hop has fought everyone in between Trinidad to Kovalev, including Trinidad and Kovalev, when Trinidad and kovalev were both at their height.

But in topic I would hold Floyd higher than pac. But that's not to take anything from pac either As another poster states pac's path has been unique

Floyd is amazing no Doudt. But I would hold him second to none if he fought. and beat pac and cotto in their primes. However he beat them both without a doubt.

[LoadedWraps]

Off topic but since you brought it up in your own thread I would put b hop above floyd in all time list. And that's not taking anything away from Floyd. But b hop has fought everyone in between Trinidad to Kovalev, including Trinidad and Kovalev, when Trinidad and kovalev were both at their height.

But in topic I would hold Floyd higher than pac. But that's not to take anything from pac either As another poster states pac's path has been unique

Floyd is amazing no Doudt. But I would hold him second to none if he fought. and beat pac and cotto in their primes. However he beat them both without a doubt.

I have a thread discussing this very thing right here.



http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=636075

[stuff jones]

Floyd, not only did he beat Manny he also beat Manny's daddy (Marquez) more clearly than Manny ever could. Combine that with being the first man to go up five weight classes without losing, a twelve time world champion, and the most lucrative prize fighter ever and I think it's pretty clear cut who the greater fighter of this era is.

What does money have to do with being a better fighter?

[Larry the boss]

why is this still up for discussion?

[LoadedWraps]

What does money have to do with being a better fighter?

Depends....being the cash cow makes you the A-side and one of the faces of the sport. That matters because you have more control over your legacy and who you fight, and you call the shots in matchmaking more. This in turn can affect your legacy.

[Don Pichardo]

I have a thread discussing this very thing right here.



http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=636075

Voted thanks

[LoadedWraps]

Anyone change their minds with Pac fighting Vargas?