Originally posted by Xi_
View Post
he should have a win over marquez in the first fight. one of the judges literally made an error on a scorecorecard, and neglected to count a legitimate knockdown.
he was awarded a win in the second fight, which was close. you cannot simply pretent that a fighter who wins a close fight didn't get a win because you don't like him.
barrera was one year removed from the first morales fight, and two years removed from his win over hamed. he's closer to a prime all time great than anybody on floyd's resume.
people have forgotten how good barrera, marquez, and morales were at FW. they're a hell of a lot better than any of floyd's WW competition.
Comment