Comments Thread For: Antonio Margarito's Manager Confirms Ring Return

[KTFO]

Margarito lost the last 3 out of 4 fights of his career, ever since the Mosley fiasco he was nothing more than a punching bag. Hell, Cotto II was almost 4 years ago and now you guys think he's just gonna come back and have fighters "running for the hills"? Wow...these guys need to just stay retired.

[aboutfkntime]

I'm tired of people saying Margarito loaded his wraps when there's 0 evidence. If he used plaster then plaster would have been found in those wraps they tested. End of story. Fckng fanboys SMH.

There are a variety of potential reasons which have been gone over before.

The bottom line is that there's no actual hard evidence he did anything wrong in the Cotto fight.

The little fcuker that I caught stealing stuff from my garage last year.......

..... was never able to successfully convince me that he was not responsible for the earlier thefts around my property.

I still dont feel sorry for what happened to him either.

Come on guys..... defence lawyers much ?

1) Fcuk him, he got caught with Mosley

2) Its pretty obvious what happened

[robbyheartbaby]

I'm keen to see him fight again, karma got him back good and he nearly lost an eye. He was still tough as f***. Some awesome big fights out there, Canelo and Margarito?! Hells yeah!

[cabalas]

Without substantial evidence, the 'loaded wraps' theory is just a cheap excuse. Among the principles of justice exists the Legal Burden of Proof. To speculate, assume, deduce, conjecture, infer, suspect, and/or theorize without proof or irrefutable evidence is just a futile exercise. If that was the case (validated or demonstrated facts for the specific fight Cotto-Margo beyond reasonable doubt against the Mexican fighter) then it would have been possible to change the result of that fight to a No Contest. However, Athletic Commissions can't operate on suppositions or hypothesis like some posters do, who by the way behave like authentic sore losers.

[Bardock]

Without substantial evidence, the 'loaded wraps' theory is just a cheap excuse. Among the principles of justice exists the Legal Burden of Proof. To speculate, assume, deduce, conjecture, infer, suspect, and/or theorize without proof or irrefutable evidence is just a futile exercise. If that was the case (validated or demonstrated facts for the specific fight Cotto-Margo beyond reasonable doubt against the Mexican fighter) then it would have been possible to change the result of that fight to a No Contest. However, Athletic Commissions can't operate on suppositions or hypothesis like some posters do, who by the way behave like authentic sore losers.

Good post. Green sent

[Dirk Diggler UK]

The little fcuker that I caught stealing stuff from my garage last year.......

..... was never able to successfully convince me that he was not responsible for the earlier thefts around my property.

I still dont feel sorry for what happened to him either.

Come on guys..... defence lawyers much ?

1) Fcuk him, he got caught with Mosley

2) Its pretty obvious what happened

Defence lawyers? There's nothing to defend. The burden of proof lays on those accusing Margarito of cheating against Cotto.

And "because HBO brainwashed me into believing it" doesn't count as proof.

[Jc8804]

Ped era. Imo so many figjters havent been caught yet officially.

This man got caught trying to cheat shane.
1 time. No evidence of the any other fight.

Now - if i was margo (who is a man that makes a living with his punches and chin) i would fight josesito lopez or alfonzo gomez at 154 like canelo did..then look to fight angulo or kirkland at 154 . Either one. After that set up a rematch with shane /mayorga 2 winner.

[HanzGruber]

Without substantial evidence, the 'loaded wraps' theory is just a cheap excuse. Among the principles of justice exists the Legal Burden of Proof. To speculate, assume, deduce, conjecture, infer, suspect, and/or theorize without proof or irrefutable evidence is just a futile exercise. If that was the case (validated or demonstrated facts for the specific fight Cotto-Margo beyond reasonable doubt against the Mexican fighter) then it would have been possible to change the result of that fight to a No Contest. However, Athletic Commissions can't operate on suppositions or hypothesis like some posters do, who by the way behave like authentic sore losers.

Considering he looked like shlt once he got caught and didn't even ko Roberto Garcia.. Yea it's not much of a stretch to think he cheated

[Tomasio]

Even thou they don't want to admit it, lately Margarito has been acting like he's desperate & looking only for a big money fights right off the bat & most of the time that type of conduct is from someone that's not well economically...No one will gain anything by beating Margarito especially after he was caught cheating he went 1-3(loosing 2 by KO & 1 got pummeled into a pulp) So I don't see any of the big names fighting him anytime soon..

[Bardock]

Considering he looked like shlt once he got caught and didn't even ko Roberto Garcia.. Yea it's not much of a stretch to think he cheated

Or you can consider he was in his 16th year as a pro at the time and had been in countless wars.