Originally posted by aboutfkntime
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Cunningham Calls PED Use ‘Massive’ Problem In Boxing
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ukalltheway View Post
How can you claim fury looks like he's on pedsOriginally posted by nacho daddy View PostFury?? he looks like a big dumb farm boy I see no sign of PED's. Joshua is what you look like when you take a ton of PED's
Ya'll are trippin-azz krazee ya'll think 2fast ain't on PED's. The man is built like a statue of a Greek god of war and has the stamina of ten thousand Irish stallions. You don't just turn southpaw like that without PED's. You don't just force Chisora to be that dejected without PED's. You don't have that kind of reflex speed and not get touched up to the head by Hammer without PED's. He's too tall, too fast, too slick, does too many squats. There's nothing natural or normal about 2fast. You guys need to open your damn eyes. This man's getting stuff from the North Korean space program or I don't even know what I'm talking about. Trust that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostAbout ****ing time you realize that Mayweather is using them. He's just an hypocrite.
I think that every fighter who undertakes WADA testing is likely clean.
I think that Pac was clean when he fought Mayweather.
And I think he performed quite well.
That fight legitimised Pac for me because I just didn't know for sure, because he has never undertaken testing before facing a good fighter.
I knew he was good, just not how good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostNah, I think thats bullshht.
I think that every fighter who undertakes WADA testing is likely clean.
I think that Pac was clean when he fought Mayweather.
And I think he performed quite well.
That fight legitimised Pac for me because I just didn't know for sure, because he has never undertaken testing before facing a good fighter.
I knew he was good, just not how good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostExcept Wada has never tested any pro boxer, clueless. And Usada has never prevented a single cheat from entering the ring. It's a sham, see Broner Molina
Get a clue fanboy.
I stated WADA..... so that clueless fanboys would not attempt to include me in their childish USADA/VADA war.
Guess which clueless fanboy tried ?
You are past helping, a pacstain for life.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostUSADA and VADA both use WADA protocols.
Get a clue fanboy.
I stated WADA..... so that clueless fanboys would not attempt to include me in their childish USADA/VADA war.
Guess which clueless fanboy tried ?
You are past helping, a pacstain for life.
So what do you think about Broner Molina, thinker?
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostThen you should have said under Wada protocols, a$$wipe. Nice try. It's not the protocols that are in question, its disclosure dumbfcuk.
So what do you think about Broner Molina, thinker?
And even after saying that to you in my post above, you attempted to drag me into that childish war.
Well, you wont like my reply
Broner/Molina, ridiculous.
Happy ?
Now, what do you think about VADA....
1) not having appropriate utensils to collect test samples from Rios
2) using a dirty hotel glass
3) testing Rios in public view
Arguing one against the other comes down to perception/favoritism, which are both fanboy qualities..... research/unbias, is much better.
I agree with you about disclosure.
My bottom line is this.....
FACT: you are a silly pacstain
FACT: after disgracing yourselves for 4 years by endorsing Pacquiaos refusal to test, and then blatantly flip-flopping when Pac finally agreed to test..... pacstains do not get to comment on PED's/testing.
I will look for a much better source of information.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostAgain, I stated WADA so that ****** fanboys would not attempt to drag me into their childish USADA/VADA war.
And even after saying that to you in my post above, you attempted to drag me into that childish war.
Well, you wont like my reply
Broner/Molina, ridiculous.
Happy ?
Now, what do you think about VADA....
1) not having appropriate utensils to collect test samples from Rios
2) using a dirty hotel glass
3) testing Rios in public view
Arguing one against the other comes down to perception/favoritism, which are both fanboy qualities..... research/unbias, is much better.
I agree with you about disclosure.
My bottom line is this.....
FACT: you are a silly pacstain
FACT: after disgracing yourselves for 4 years by endorsing Pacquiaos refusal to test, and then blatantly flip-flopping when Pac finally agreed to test..... pacstains do not get to comment on PED's/testing.
I will look for a much better source of information.
1. They've busted cheats and prevented them from fighting, unlike Usada. While charging way less, probably cause you're not buying their silence
2. They don't have nowhere near the record of improprieties. That stuff you listed is a joke compared to some of the Usada incidents
The point is, all of this OST style testing is a joke as long as its contracted by promoters and fighters
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostMy point is not that Vada is better, though since you mention it, they are since
1. They've busted cheats and prevented them from fighting, unlike Usada. While charging way less, probably cause you're not buying their silence
2. They don't have nowhere near the record of improprieties. That stuff you listed is a joke compared to some of the Usada incidents
The point is, all of this OST style testing is a joke as long as its contracted by promoters and fighters
2) the testing for both organisations takes place in the same laboratory
3) the testing war, is even more mindless than the network war, which is almost as mindless as the promotional war..... all of which are completely unnecessary..... I dont do fcukery, I prefer boxing
4) the USADA is corrupt talk, is mindless buffoonery from silly pacstains
5) as explained..... I do not discuss steroid abuse or drug testing with Pacquiao fans, they disqualified themselves from that conversation by displaying blatant dishonesty, diesrespect for the sport, and blatant bias by flip-flopping when Pac eventually started testing
Comment
Comment