Not true more people from the press had it for PBF.
It's also funny that this guy doesn't show the first 6 rounds, which PBF won at least 5 of the first rounds.
See I'm not the least bit biased....because both guys are my favorite fighters and I would not award the fight unequally to either one. I just think there is no way in hell the fight could be scored for PBF.
In my estimation...they should take points away from people for running away in a fight. That's why when I watched Tito v.s. Oscar again....I called it a draw. Initially I scored it in favor to Oscar but he ran like a ****ing *****.
I think when someone pedals away from someone the entire fight...a couple of 10-8 rounds should be awarded to the agressor. In fact....I automatically score the fight for an agressor and it's up to the person pedaling away to land punches that stop him, and reverse the tide.
PBF clearly won that fight, I had it 116-111. That's not a close fight in my eyes.
u said it best. not even one pro judge or commentator had it 116-111, point being u dont know how to judge. how can u even make an issue on points if u dont know what your talking about?
yeah well PBF was carryin a bad shoulder injury u FOOLS, just watch the rematch 2 see wot PBF did to him when PBF was fightin injury-free
he took the fight, he showed up he risked it and should of not got the victory, you fool the second fight is not the one being questioned. just because he won the first it means the second one should not be questioned
u said it best. not even one pro judge or commentator had it 116-111, point being u dont know how to judge. how can u even make an issue on points if u dont know what your talking about?
Here is the 3 judges scores.
Judge: Anek Hongtongkam 116-111 | Judge: John Keane 115-111 | Judge: Jerry Roth 115-111
Comment