Comments Thread For: Arum: Mayweather-Berto a Farce, Should've Faced Khan!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fook That BOY
    Tax ur Ass
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2015
    • 204
    • 12
    • 11
    • 6,288

    #41
    I rather see Berto vs Broner, at least Broner will engage in the fight! Easy UD for the Flo mos master.

    Comment

    • MCU
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 11
      • 0
      • 0
      • 6,052

      #42
      Khan is nobody to Duck. Your talking about a guy getting off the canvas against Diaz.

      Arum only sees an opportunity for his roster.

      Comment

      • Lazakill
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2010
        • 251
        • 18
        • 0
        • 6,317

        #43
        LMAO, the agenda and sheer hate against Khan from certain posters is real.

        Saying that what has Khan done to deserve it...

        Well please tell me, WHAT THE **** did Ortiz or Guerrero do that was so amazing to deserve Mayweather?

        What did Rios, Algieri do to deserve Pacquiao?

        As of right now, if you guys are saying Khan does not deserve it, then no welterweight currently does. NOT ONE. I don't give a **** if they're undefeated or have a belt, because you guys are clearly judging him off who he's fought at 147, and no other welterweight has fought all these top names either. And it's absolutely hilarious how they just casually ignore the fact that Mayweather's fighting Berto as if it's going straight past their heads. A guy who has done NOTHING whatsoever to warrant it.

        Khan, hands down, including his 140 wins, has the best resume bar Pacquiao or Mayweather entirely of all the other 147's.

        If you're going to challenge me by saying Collazo was shot, then you're a moron because he came off his career best win and only fought that 'beast' you guys call Thurman and hurt him and he didn't look good at all in beating him. Algieri beat the other 'beast' you guys called Provodnikov, which people seem to forget, and lost badly vs the 2nd best fighter of this era. He also dominated Alexander who all of you said Khan was ducking.

        Three solid WW wins in a span of 12 months of being at welterweight.

        So please, if you're going to use your obvious hatred filled agenda to try justify that Khan doesn't deserve it, then try apply it to every other fighter at WW, something none of you like to do because you know it just makes you wrong.
        Last edited by Lazakill; 08-11-2015, 09:00 AM.

        Comment

        • thack
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 12873
          • 2,935
          • 1,340
          • 53,931

          #44
          Originally posted by Lazakill
          LMAO, the agenda and sheer hate against Khan from certain posters is real.

          Saying that what has Khan done to deserve it...

          Well please tell me, WHAT THE **** did Ortiz or Guerrero do that was so amazing to deserve Mayweather?

          What did Rios, Algieri do to deserve Pacquiao?

          As of right now, if you guys are saying Khan does not deserve it, then no welterweight currently does. NOT ONE. I don't give a **** if they're undefeated or have a belt, because you guys are clearly judging him off who he's fought at 147, and no other welterweight has fought all these top names either. And it's absolutely hilarious how they just casually ignore the fact that Mayweather's fighting Berto as if it's going straight past their heads. A guy who has done NOTHING whatsoever to warrant it.

          Khan, hands down, including his 140 wins, has the best resume bar Pacquiao or Mayweather entirely of all the other 147's.

          If you're going to challenge me by saying Collazo was shot, then you're a moron because he came off his career best win and only fought that 'beast' you guys call Thurman and hurt him and he didn't look good at all in beating him. Algieri beat the other 'beast' you guys called Provodnikov, which people seem to forget, and lost badly vs the 2nd best fighter of this era. He also dominated Alexander who all of you said Khan was ducking.

          Three solid WW wins in a span of 12 months of being at welterweight.

          So please, if you're going to use your obvious hatred filled agenda to try justify that Khan doesn't deserve it, then try apply it to every other fighter at WW, something none of you like to do because you know it just makes you wrong.
          Read the posts above you idiot .....and stop lying to your self, your man is a fraud, plain and simple.Don't be in denial you'll feel so much better when this burden is lifted.

          Comment

          • FrankieBruno
            GGG spanked my mom
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2011
            • 12208
            • 320
            • 12
            • 22,246

            #45
            Originally posted by Lazakill
            LMAO, the agenda and sheer hate against Khan from certain posters is real.

            Saying that what has Khan done to deserve it...

            Well please tell me, WHAT THE **** did Ortiz or Guerrero do that was so amazing to deserve Mayweather?

            What did Rios, Algieri do to deserve Pacquiao?

            As of right now, if you guys are saying Khan does not deserve it, then no welterweight currently does. NOT ONE. I don't give a **** if they're undefeated or have a belt, because you guys are clearly judging him off who he's fought at 147, and no other welterweight has fought all these top names either. And it's absolutely hilarious how they just casually ignore the fact that Mayweather's fighting Berto as if it's going straight past their heads. A guy who has done NOTHING whatsoever to warrant it.

            Khan, hands down, including his 140 wins, has the best resume bar Pacquiao or Mayweather entirely of all the other 147's.

            If you're going to challenge me by saying Collazo was shot, then you're a moron because he came off his career best win and only fought that 'beast' you guys call Thurman and hurt him and he didn't look good at all in beating him. Algieri beat the other 'beast' you guys called Provodnikov, which people seem to forget, and lost badly vs the 2nd best fighter of this era. He also dominated Alexander who all of you said Khan was ducking.

            Three solid WW wins in a span of 12 months of being at welterweight.

            So please, if you're going to use your obvious hatred filled agenda to try justify that Khan doesn't deserve it, then try apply it to every other fighter at WW, something none of you like to do because you know it just makes you wrong.
            great post

            Comment

            • thack
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 12873
              • 2,935
              • 1,340
              • 53,931

              #46
              Originally posted by lazakill
              lmao, the agenda and sheer hate against khan from certain posters is real.

              Saying that what has khan done to deserve it...

              Well please tell me, what the **** did ortiz or guerrero do that was so amazing to deserve mayweather?

              What did rios, algieri do to deserve pacquiao?

              As of right now, if you guys are saying khan does not deserve it, then no welterweight currently does. Not one. I don't give a **** if they're undefeated or have a belt, because you guys are clearly judging him off who he's fought at 147, and no other welterweight has fought all these top names either. And it's absolutely hilarious how they just casually ignore the fact that mayweather's fighting berto as if it's going straight past their heads. A guy who has done nothing whatsoever to warrant it.

              Khan, hands down, including his 140 wins, has the best resume bar pacquiao or mayweather entirely of all the other 147's.

              If you're going to challenge me by saying collazo was shot, then you're a moron because he came off his career best win and only fought that 'beast' you guys call thurman and hurt him and he didn't look good at all in beating him. Algieri beat the other 'beast' you guys called provodnikov, which people seem to forget, and lost badly vs the 2nd best fighter of this era. He also dominated alexander who all of you said khan was ducking.

              Three solid ww wins in a span of 12 months of being at welterweight.

              So please, if you're going to use your obvious hatred filled agenda to try justify that khan doesn't deserve it, then try apply it to every other fighter at ww, something none of you like to do because you know it just makes you wrong.
              #fightbrook

              Comment

              • Jayallday9
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 761
                • 61
                • 35
                • 11,841

                #47
                honestly at this point, Pac needs Khan!!

                Comment

                • TheStranger
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 196
                  • 11
                  • 5
                  • 6,456

                  #48
                  Its' been said before but Khan should have fought Brook for his strap if his resume is so weak, but he didn't. He didn't learn anything from Alexander. Enough said.

                  Floyd should have rematched Cotto (a good sendoff for both and since he gave him the hardest fight of "the big 3"), and Canelo should stop masquerading as a 155 lb junior middleweight (a trick he learned from the equally entitled Chavez Jr. no doubt) and fight Gennady Golovkin since he's so over-hyped and under-accomplished according to this forum.

                  The way things are, I'm saving a lot of money.
                  Last edited by TheStranger; 08-11-2015, 10:31 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Amgwanagitbuti
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Aug 2014
                    • 106
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    • 6,167

                    #49
                    Originally posted by BrometheusBob
                    Of the available options Mayweather chose someone who has been fighting once a year against subpar competition and not looking good in the process. That would not be a credible opponent.
                    Especially for $30+ million. Imagine putting that money back into ShowTime's budget. Several great fights could be made with that chunk of cash. If Floyd stinks up the joint in September, I don't see a bidding war next spring for 50 and 0.

                    Comment

                    • VG_Addict
                      king meat's twin
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2012
                      • 5618
                      • 237
                      • 3
                      • 53,380

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Furn
                      Because Khan only ever has trouble against power punchers and pressure fighters and has barely lost a round against fighters who fight on the outside and let Khan dictate the pace.

                      Floyd ducked Khan, that's undeniable.
                      Khan can't outbox Floyd.

                      It's a myth that only power puncher can trouble Khan. Ancient Julio Diaz and Algieri troubled him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP