Comments Thread For: Mayweather: I Beat The Big 3 - Pacquiao, Canelo, Cotto

[Johnwoo8686]

Every time a Pac fan posts the compubox and Lederman scorecards in the Castillo fight people should post the compubox and Lederman scorecards of the Pacquiao fight.

Its funny how now all of a sudden compubox does not count.

[elfag]

People have *****ed for the last 5 years that Floyd was afraid of Pac, he nearly shuts him out at 10-2 and now the next big scary opponent Floyd is ducking is Amir ****ing Khan, who struggled with Algeri. Yeah floyd is shaking in his boots at fighting khan.

[Showtime..]

Yeah, Chavez got robbed against Pernell.

[radioraheem]

Very interesting list and thought process. Most surprised at Chavez #4.

Yes, that was a little surprising. But not too surprising because he did have a crazy track record.

So surprising he picked Duran as the greatest ever. I mean he picks himself for the greatest ever so excluding himself he believes Duran is the best fighter of all time.

But frustrating as hell that he doesn't even have Robinson in his top 5.

That was the most surprising pick, especially since Duran has been very critical of Floyd in the press. I doubt Floyd has heard any of his harsh criticism. Which is good cause it makes his list more genuine. It's very interesting about Duran, because he must see a lot of things in Duran that is tough for fighters to beat.

I'm not even gonna get into his picks but rather the reasoning...Duran gets picked for winning a title at 160....Mayweather repeats he won so many belts in so many divisions....yet Mayweather himself has yet to even challenge at 160.

Then he says Ali lost all three times to Norton but what about Castillo?

Mayweather just isn't a bright guy when it comes to articulating himself, possibly because he is rarely even honest. Puts CHavez over SRL and Robinson lol Cmon now.

If you think he picked Duran as #2 just because he won at 160, you are fooling yourself. He obviously sees alot of qualities, like SKILL, in what Duran did in the ring. Then that added with his accomplishments. It's for these same reasons I'm not surprised he picked Whitaker at #3.

Finally, it's HIS LIST. It's just his opinion. If you made a Top 5 with the same selections at your disposal, I'm sure you'll find plenty of people that disagree with your rankings and picks too.

[Bronx2245]

And Pacquiao beat another better big 3: Barrera, Morales & Marquez. Each on more than one occasion I might add.

Sorry but Pacquiao lost to Morales, and got decapitated by Marquez, and if you want to give Marquez credit (which he deserves), then Floyd should say he beat the BIG 4: Cotto, Canelo, Marquez, and Pacquiao!

[Raonic]

That doesn't mean you can cherry pick a bum.

[FlatLine]

past prime Pac and Cotto and a weight-drained Canelo.. big deal..

Floyd forgot to mention he ducked Pac, Cotto, Williams, Wright, Margarito and now Khan when they were actually in their prime

[jcpryor]

past prime Pac and Cotto and a weight-drained Canelo.. big deal..

Floyd forgot to mention he ducked Pac, Cotto, Williams, Wright, Margarito and now Khan when they were actually in their prime

All the while Mayweather has never aged and is still in his prime , huh?

[V.WEBB]

Older than all of them too.

But he doesn't age doe.

[hitking]

And Pacquiao beat another better big 3: Barrera, Morales & Marquez. Each on more than one occasion I might add.

Which of that Big III would you pick to beat Cotto or Canelo?