Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Khan Won Two Titles? So Did Andre Berto!

[SalimShady1212]

So what? Brook has won one but would beat the living daylights out of Berto. Number of world titles doesn't mean a fighter is better than someone else, Zab Judah was undisputed champion and has lost to people he "should" have beat.

[thack]

Mayweather needs to stop using Khans name to hype his fight.

He doesn't he was asked why not Thurman or Khan and answered , he ignores Khan ....always !

[heihaci]

Ortiz and Soto Karass are Berto's daddies. That's just plain embarrasing

[rasdun]

You just said we shouldn't consider recent performance but should consider wins from years ago.

So we should ignore this:




And think about Khan's wins over Judah and Maidana.

For the dim-wtted and slow-minded, WE SHOULD CONSIDER EVERYTHING that will factor into whether someone is a challenge. And that would include their age, opponent selection and results over the years - mostly being fights from the past few years.

I would think it would go without saying that fights from the last few years can be more helpful to determine whether a certain fighter is "deserving".

Fights from app 15 years ago - like Mosely's win over de la Hoya, or from 9 years ago, like wins over Vargas, not so much. Mosely hasn't fought in almost 2 yrs and hasn't won in more than 2 years. So that is important when looking at whether Moswely would be deserving. LMFAO! Got that. Do you see the difference between comparing wins by a 42 year old from 9-15 yrs ago and wins by a fighter in his prime from a few years ago?!? lol

[whatismyname]

Thurman, brook and Khan....neither of the 3 would've been complain worthy...this fight with Berto is dog ****

[rasdun]

Thurman, brook and Khan....neither of the 3 would've been complain worthy...this fight with Berto is dog ****

or even Porter or Garica - that's the point. Some people will complain about anything. But most smart boxing fans and boxing insiders would've been fine with any of those 5

[-PBP-]

For the dim-wtted and slow-minded, WE SHOULD CONSIDER EVERYTHING that will factor into whether someone is a challenge. And that would include their age, opponent selection and results over the years - mostly being fights from the past few years.

I would think it would go without saying that fights from the last few years can be more helpful to determine whether a certain fighter is "deserving".

Fights from app 15 years ago - like Mosely's win over de la Hoya, or from 9 years ago, like wins over Vargas, not so much. Mosely hasn't fought in almost 2 yrs and hasn't won in more than 2 years. So that is important when looking at whether Moswely would be deserving. LMFAO! Got that. Do you see the difference between comparing wins by a 42 year old from 9-15 yrs ago and wins by a fighter in his prime from a few years ago?!? lol

Dude, your a rambling mess. Khan hasn't done **** at welterweight and poses no threat to Mayweather. He has done nothing to earn this fight and just wants a fat paycheck so he can fly back home, get fat and go fishing like Maidana. He will get timed with counter right hands and will be gunshy and the fight will be a boring one-sided UD. He's proven over and over again that he is not on this level. His wins from years ago are irrelevant just like Mosley's.

[alexguiness]

Floyd has a point - Berto has done more at 147 than Khan has.

If Khan had fought Brook he could have brought a IBF Belt to the table.

All this 'Khan's speed, Khan's jab blah blah blah' he has still done nothing (Alexander aside) at 147.

3 Defeats and hasn't had a World title since what 2011?

[bopbopbbe]

Floyd is a joke at this point.

[FrankieBruno]

Floyd really is scared of Khan

He is talking more about Khan in this presser than he is talking about Berto