Ike is also a bit overrated since whenever a fighter vanishes in their prime we ask "What if" for years. While that was a tough fight, 99% of those punches were smothered at extremely close ranges and bad angles (credit to Tua's defense moreso than his chin).
Tyson did stand up to several beatdowns admirably for a while but since he still went down or quit in every example it's hard to give him many "chin points".
Everyone has their own definition of chin I guess.
I think Tua had better defense, underrated defense. Tyson's Dempsey-roll defense worked a lot better when he was very young and turned into a waste of energy after he lost his speed. Tua could only be so slick given his physique but at close ranges he was very hard to land a good flush punch on.
ike was good though. no one went to war with tua or beat down byrd like ike did.
i disagree on the defense. tua was solid but he ate a lot (PUNCHES). tyson def was better imo.
Comment