Comments Thread For: ESPN: Garcia-Malignaggi Peaked Near 1.5 Million Viewers

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Beater_of_ass
    male ass that is
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 7172
    • 281
    • 144
    • 13,666

    #11
    Originally posted by bigdunny1
    Numbers are still bad. Spent a insane amount on purses and got out done in TV ratings to UFC prelim fights that was a fraction of the cost.
    They got HBO numbers, on their 2nd show. Granted the audience is about 3 times bigger, but it's not terrible. You're now comparing a main even boxing event to the prelims. Yes, they got more ratings, the entire card, prelim or not, got way more coverage in the media.

    Comment

    • R_Walken
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 5932
      • 340
      • 789
      • 57,069

      #12
      Good peak #

      typical lames being critical I can sense the tears hitting their keyboard as they type

      Comment

      • Gonzalez_Boxing
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2007
        • 2290
        • 112
        • 226
        • 9,305

        #13
        Originally posted by Nomadic
        It was a great fight, granted it was Paulie he was fighting, Danny looked ok at 147.

        Comment

        • bigdunny1
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2015
          • 14762
          • 382
          • 2
          • 167,136

          #14
          Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
          They got HBO numbers, on their 2nd show. Granted the audience is about 3 times bigger, but it's not terrible. You're now comparing a main even boxing event to the prelims. Yes, they got more ratings, the entire card, prelim or not, got way more coverage in the media.
          Got HBO numbers despite the fact that ESPN is on more homes 3 times more and on basic cable. Also PBC paid way more for this then HBO did for the kovalev card. Check the purses paid out. When you spend more money for the card, and have to pay the networks for the time share on top, and you are on basic cable you need higher ratings then HBO numbers to lure TV advertisers to help recoup these multi million loses. And no matter how people spin in it your main event loses to a UFC prelim is bad. Compared to comparables on network and basic cable these ratings stink.

          Comment

          • AddiX
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 7865
            • 416
            • 45
            • 30,565

            #15
            It's not a great number but it's an improvement, which is what PBC needs desperately.

            You need remember this **** had all day coverage on sports center, Showtime and hbo never get that, so that could be big for PBC in the future.

            But espn won't cover there fights that aren't on espn, so I dunno.

            Comment

            • Beater_of_ass
              male ass that is
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 7172
              • 281
              • 144
              • 13,666

              #16
              Originally posted by bigdunny1
              Got HBO numbers despite the fact that ESPN is on more homes 3 times more and on basic cable. Also PBC paid way more for this then HBO did for the kovalev card. Check the purses paid out. When you spend more money for the card, and have to pay the networks for the time share on top, and you are on basic cable you need higher ratings then HBO numbers to lure TV advertisers to help recoup these multi million loses. And no matter how people spin in it your main event loses to a UFC prelim is bad. Compared to comparables on network and basic cable these ratings stink.
              ESPN didn't spend the money, so the point is irrelevant. They got HBO boxing ratings on their second show on ESPN. It's a good start, I never said it was anything more than that.

              Comment

              • AddiX
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 7865
                • 416
                • 45
                • 30,565

                #17
                Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
                ESPN didn't spend the money, so the point is irrelevant. They got HBO boxing ratings on their second show on ESPN. It's a good start, I never said it was anything more than that.
                No but they spent a lot of valuable television time promoting and covering it.

                ESPN gets crazy views, there tv time is freaking expensive.

                Comment

                • bigdunny1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2015
                  • 14762
                  • 382
                  • 2
                  • 167,136

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Beater_of_ass
                  ESPN didn't spend the money, so the point is irrelevant. They got HBO boxing ratings on their second show on ESPN. It's a good start, I never said it was anything more than that.
                  Did I say ESPN lost money? PBC did and PBC takes the hit when these fights get bad ratings. ESPN gets paid ahead of time they could care less. This is like them airing informercials. But these are bad for PBC they are not overspending HBO to get HBO numbers. That makes no sense

                  Comment

                  • Beater_of_ass
                    male ass that is
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 7172
                    • 281
                    • 144
                    • 13,666

                    #19
                    Originally posted by bigdunny1
                    Did I say ESPN lost money? PBC did and PBC takes the hit when these fights get bad ratings. ESPN gets paid ahead of time they could care less. This is like them airing informercials. But these are bad for PBC they are not overspending HBO to get HBO numbers. That makes no sense
                    How do you know the finances of PBC? Did you even know the investors know they were going to lose all this money? They aren't overspending to get HBO numbers, they are overspending to grow the brand. Costs money to make money.

                    Comment

                    • Beater_of_ass
                      male ass that is
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 7172
                      • 281
                      • 144
                      • 13,666

                      #20
                      Originally posted by AddiX
                      No but they spent a lot of valuable television time promoting and covering it.

                      ESPN gets crazy views, there tv time is freaking expensive.
                      And it was paid ahead of time by Al Haymon.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP