Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: I'd Love a Rematch With Danny Garcia, Peterson

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
    This.

    Khan knows Maidana would brutalize him and end his career and he wants none of it.
    So you wouldn't complain If Khan wins again, you wouldn't make excuses up for Maidana bloating up weight and you wouldn't say he needs a tune-up fight before he gets in with the ring with Khan again?

    I agree though he should have fought Maidana the time when Chino was offering Khan that fight instead of wanting to fight Floyd, that'd have been the perfect thing to do IF he did that he'd have likely got to fight Floyd assuming he won it but he didn't and now Chino has had a long break.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by yoz View Post
      Weak response.

      Not that I want to be get involved in your petty squabble, but... didn't Kell turn down/side step several chances to fight for a world title?
      He turned down 1 world title fight for no money + 3 options against Bradley when he had a guaranteed mandatory shot at the IBF title.

      Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
      I'm confused. how did Kell do it the hard way?
      Practically all of his fights have been at home against soft touches and he is older than Khan started his professional career before Khan and has more fights against who....
      Because he had to fight his way up the rankings? Often little exposure on small shows - Do you honestly think he didn't want to fight any top names?

      Khan, because of his name, has suffered multiple defeats - Yet gets an opportunity straight after those defeats. Imagine Brook had been knocked out by Porter the same way as Khan vs Garcia - Do you think he'd get a chance to headline in Vegas anytime soon?

      That's the hard way. Not saying he's fought harder opponents, of course not, but his career has been tougher in the sense that fewer opportunities were given to him.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
        Judah of today let alone the one from the day Khan fought would smash anyone on Brook's resume minus Porter.

        You're not making any sense. Some people pay their dues in the amateurs, some on the job as pros. No body asked Kell to turn pro so, early. He could've waited like L.Campbell.

        Oh and your martyr playing is so cute. Brook was a mandatory challenger since, 2010 for one version or another and it took him 4 years to materialize a World title chance. "he earned it doe". At the end it's about names beaten.

        Not, which weight class its more prestigious to be a champion in, a hollow victory you parade around with on NSB.
        Haha, absolutely not. Judah was shot the bits then and hasn't won against anyone decent since. He probably wouldn't even last with Hatton.

        Pay your dues in the amateurs? Oh my god, what a ****** response. They are two completely different sports. One was picked for England number 1s and one was picked for the B team. Obviously Khan's style is very amateurish, and Brook's style is for pros. So should he have stuck as an amateur for 10 more years to try and get an opportunity for the Olympics? GTFO

        He became mandatory for Pacquiao's WBO title - Yeah, good luck trying to force a mandatory on that one

        You're smashing pies in your own face all day long.

        Being a champion at welterweight is undoubtedly more prestigious than being one at light welterweight.

        Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
        Garcia is an elite fighter. It won't be easy for Khan as some people suggest. However, it is a perfect fight to be made for fall. As someone said, Khan either boxes his ears off or gets KTFO in to an oblivion. Another one I'd take is Porter for the WBC title provided Mayweather vacates.
        Khan isn't fighting either of those two, and he's not fighting Thurman or Brook either - and definitely not rematching Maidana.

        He'll fight a light punching "name" like a Peterson, or an over the hill fighter like Marquez or Pacquiao. Hell, even Rios is too dangerous at this point.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
          He's been asking for the Danny rematch for years, Angel says no, watch his latest interview..

          Khan was in training for the Peterson rematch, its not Khans fault Peterson was caught juicing. But i guess Khan is to blame rite?
          Yeah it is. That was how many years ago??? Look, your boy is a weasel. I follow this game close, Khan hasn't been hounding for a rematch that hard if at all. Khan won't fight anyone today.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            Haha, absolutely not. Judah was shot the bits then and hasn't won against anyone decent since. He probably wouldn't even last with Hatton.

            Pay your dues in the amateurs? Oh my god, what a ****** response. They are two completely different sports. One was picked for England number 1s and one was picked for the B team. Obviously Khan's style is very amateurish, and Brook's style is for pros. So should he have stuck as an amateur for 10 more years to try and get an opportunity for the Olympics? GTFO
            You really have some serious comprehension issues.

            Look at all the Olympic medalists who fight for titles so soon. What is that saying?

            Well, that B team pattern seems to have transcended to the pros. So, how many names outside of Porter in 35 fights did Brook's "professional" style beat?

            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            He became mandatory for Pacquiao's WBO title - Yeah, good luck trying to force a mandatory on that one

            You're smashing pies in your own face all day long.

            Being a champion at welterweight is undoubtedly more prestigious than being one at light welterweight.
            Ummm I said for one version OR another. Again, having comprehension issues or deliberately picking and choosing. Overall point being Brook has been ready for a shot since, 2010.

            Smashing pies? This whole claiming imaginary points is a new Kell-end tactic?

            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            Khan isn't fighting either of those two, and he's not fighting Thurman or Brook either - and definitely not rematching Maidana.

            He'll fight a light punching "name" like a Peterson, or an over the hill fighter like Marquez or Pacquiao. Hell, even Rios is too dangerous at this point.
            Aah only if he was fighting Brook.
            Last edited by Box-Office; 08-05-2015, 02:26 AM.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
              You really have some serious comprehension issues.

              Look at all the Olympic medalists who fight for titles so soon. What is that saying?

              Well, that B team pattern seems to have transcended to the pros. So, how many names outside of Porter in 35 fights did Brook's "professional" style beat?



              Ummm I said for one version OR another. Again, having comprehension issues or deliberately picking and choosing. Overall point being Brook has been ready for a shot since, 2010.

              Smashing pies? This whole claiming imaginary points is a new Kell-end tactic?



              Aah only if he was fighting Brook.
              Reading your posts regarding Khan is just unbelievable only a delusional person such as your self could do such a thing , why lie to your self .You've admitted that Khan is running like a rat from Brook but you still slate Brook do you not see that by doing this you are also telling us what we already know about Khan..... you make no sense!

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                You really have some serious comprehension issues.

                Look at all the Olympic medalists who fight for titles so soon. What is that saying?

                Well, that B team pattern seems to have transcended to the pros. So, how many names outside of Porter in 35 fights did Brook's "professional" style beat?
                Where are my comprehension issues exactly? You are saying something that doesn't make sense, I come with a rebuttal and then you try and say the same thing in a different way.

                Yeah - Let's look at it. Who's got a better resume of AJ and Hughie Fury? Is Rudenko not a better opponent than anyone Joshua has faced? Yes. So why is Joshua ranked in the top 15 and Fury at something like #60. Is that fair or hard on Hughie?

                Well Brook is a world champion and ranked higher by everyone than Khan? He's undefeated and P4P higher than Khan. So I guess he had his run, but it's over as far as being ranked over Brook.


                Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                Ummm I said for one version OR another. Again, having comprehension issues or deliberately picking and choosing. Overall point being Brook has been ready for a shot since, 2010.

                Smashing pies? This whole claiming imaginary points is a new Kell-end tactic?
                Yes you did, and the one version was Pacquiao's which he never fought a mandatory for As I said, good luck with that.

                The other was cancelled a few times, but he ended up winning it against an undefeated champion.

                Originally posted by thack View Post
                Reading your posts regarding Khan is just unbelievable only a delusional person such as your self could do such a thing , why lie to your self .You've admitted that Khan is running like a rat from Brook but you still slate Brook do you not see that by doing this you are also telling us what we already know about Khan..... you make no sense!
                He's very delusional and one sided when it comes to Khan. He believes everything he says even though Mr "I sparred with Ward" has a proven lying track record.

                Comment


                • #88
                  I'd like to see anyone of those rematches,but I think he'll lose both tbh..He just needs to fight Brook and be done with it..

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by thack View Post
                    Reading your posts regarding Khan is just unbelievable only a delusional person such as your self could do such a thing , why lie to your self .You've admitted that Khan is running like a rat from Brook but you still slate Brook do you not see that by doing this you are also telling us what we already know about Khan..... you make no sense!
                    Uhh umm why do you even bother talking to me, when your whole idea of posting is to tell others they make no sense and insult them if they don't agree with you?

                    Funny how if I were to insult you back you'll tell me "I'm from the gutter" and cry foul.

                    Move along.
                    Last edited by Box-Office; 08-05-2015, 04:58 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                      Uhh umm why do you even bother talking to me, when your whole idea of posting is to tell others they make no sense and insult them if they don't agree with you?

                      Funny how if I were to insult you back you'll tell me "I'm from the gutter" and cry foul.

                      Move along.
                      All I am stating to you is that your posts make NO sense , your one sided ridiculous assessment of Amir Khan is just embarrassing with your almost child like protection;
                      If you pick another fighter things may not be so embarrassing for you , have a go on Berto as it seems he's the top welter in his camp.....all the best.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP