I wouldn't put my house on it happening by a long shot. Remember this is Amir Khan we're talking about - a liar and a hypocrite. He has been putting up these stipulations for years now.
He said Brook would lose to Matthew Hatton and then he would fight Hatton after he beat Brook. Brook smashed Hatton and he still dismissed him.
Khan tried to fight Senchenko after he beat Ricky Hatton but Brook smashed him and then Khan said "Senchenko was finished".
Then it was "Brook has to win a world title". He said Brook would lose to Porter but if he won, he would take the fight. Brook deals with Porter and Khan says in the studio after the fight "Let's have it next man" etc etc. Then b1tches out when it came time to make the fight.
Now it's "Brook has to beat two names". I envisage a similar approach from Khan as his idiotic fantards are taking now. Anyone that Brook beats, Khan will probably try to belittle or say he needs to fight someone else.
He said Brook would lose to Matthew Hatton and then he would fight Hatton after he beat Brook. Brook smashed Hatton and he still dismissed him.
Khan tried to fight Senchenko after he beat Ricky Hatton but Brook smashed him and then Khan said "Senchenko was finished".
Then it was "Brook has to win a world title". He said Brook would lose to Porter but if he won, he would take the fight. Brook deals with Porter and Khan says in the studio after the fight "Let's have it next man" etc etc. Then b1tches out when it came time to make the fight.
Now it's "Brook has to beat two names". I envisage a similar approach from Khan as his idiotic fantards are taking now. Anyone that Brook beats, Khan will probably try to belittle or say he needs to fight someone else.
Comment