Avenging a loss or a "0" which one better defines greatness or the best?

[Fists_of_Fury]

Exactly this argument is ******..it's like they are saying you have to lose to be great..i literally never heard this until Floyd never lost

That shows how good Floyd is. Floyd is held to WAY higher standards than other fighters. They even try to come out with new criteria to score fights because of Floyd lol.

[Larry the boss]

Then it is funny..when a fighter loses on here what do we hear?

1-Oh he was exposed

2-He was overrated

Let just be real, in sports the goal is to WIN!!!! losing=YOU FAILED!!!!! if you avenge it cool...but lets not act like greatness is gauged by losses because thats a damn lie..greatness is judged on WINNING

[Larry the boss]

I guess we should treat boxing like the special Olympics and make a "BEST EFFORT" champion

[PAC-BOY]

Then it is funny..when a fighter loses on here what do we hear?

1-Oh he was exposed

2-He was overrated

Let just be real, in sports the goal is to WIN!!!! losing=YOU FAILED!!!!! if you avenge it cool...but lets not act like greatness is gauged by losses because thats a damn lie..greatness is judged on WINNING

You got a lot to learn about the fight game.

[Larry the boss]

You got a lot to learn about the fight game.

Educate me then...im listening

[PAC-BOY]

Educate me then...im listening

You just called the later great SRR less than great because he loss! How can i educate someone who believes only winning (despite the quality of opposition) makes a fighter Great? You cant educate someone like that. Like you! Honestly i would think youd get it by now! But you still dont! Sad. Very sad.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Fighters who cherry pick there way to the top and have fights made for them to win so they can keep their 0 in tact as a marketing tool DOES NOT make a fighter GREAT.

You are a moron... Floyd didn't get to cherry pick his way to the top. Floyd fought tough fights and earned his #1 P4P ranking unlike your **** idol,#48. #48, cherry picked his way to P4P #1 while Floyd was retired. #48, cherry picked his way to the top and had fights made for him to win since moving up to 135lbs FFS! The funny thing is that #48 was suppose to beat Floyd until he couldn't... now ****s like yourself call it a cherry pick. You yourself picked #48 to beat Floyd LOL... salty much? Floyd could fight and beat KOvalev and GGG back to back at their weight and there would still be excuses!

[Fists_of_Fury]

I guess we should treat boxing like the special Olympics and make a "BEST EFFORT" champion

#48ers would love that... they score fights that way anyways lol

[PAC-BOY]

You are a moron... Floyd didn't get to cherry pick his way to the top. Floyd fought tough fights and earned his #1 P4P ranking unlike your **** idol,#48. #48, cherry picked his way to P4P #1 while Floyd was retired. #48, cherry picked his way to the top and had fights made for him to win since moving up to 135lbs FFS! The funny thing is that #48 was suppose to beat Floyd until he couldn't... now ****s like yourself call it a cherry pick. You yourself picked #48 to beat Floyd LOL... salty much? Floyd could fight and beat KOvalev and GGG back to back at their weight and there would still be excuses!

when you see two grown folks talking you dont interrupt. You here me ...boy?

[FeFist]

Fighter B= 100
Fighter C= 20.

A fighter beating fighter B, without losing, would be better than a fighter beating fighter B after suffering a loss to them.

A fighter beating fighter C, without losing, would not be better than a fighter beating fighter B after suffering a loss to them.

A loss would not enhance someone's legacy; they would always be better off with the W on their resume. At the same time (something people already know) a 0 finds its value in the names behind the numbers on their win collum.