why do people think marquesz beats broner,brook or porter???

[STAX ON DECK]

lets be honest for a second here,,marqeuz only looks good against slow cement footed brawlers who never learned basic movement fundementals like mike alvacado,juan diaz,katshitis and so on. put him in there with someone who can move like floyd and to a extent,bradley, then he will look mediocre,plus u cant forget that his opponent will ask for drug testing since hes with memo

anywat my point is that if marquezs wants to retire on a W he should consider fighting provokiov or rios or another crappy brawler

[vorgaphe]

Remove Broner from that list and you may be right. But to suggest the Marquez only does well against flat-flooted brawlers shows how little you know about boxing. Prime Manny had some of the fastest feet ever, yet JMM kept up with him well. Brook and Porter present problems because they're much bigger than JMM and in their primes. Nothing more, nothing less.

[STAX ON DECK]

Remove Broner from that list and you may be right. But to suggest the Marquez only does well against flat-flooted brawlers shows how little you know about boxing. Prime Manny had some of the fastest feet ever, yet JMM kept up with him well. Brook and Porter present problems because they're much bigger than JMM and in their primes. Nothing more, nothing less.

well i mean he has pacs number down and pac is a pretty much a brawler when he was fighting marquez back to back so it doesnt shock me to see marquezs do well against him and also,,theres no doubt in my mind that broner beats the brakes off marquezs,does it very easy to all he has to do is use the mayweather blueprint,

[Psylence83]

Remove Broner from that list and you may be right. But to suggest the Marquez only does well against flat-flooted brawlers shows how little you know about boxing. Prime Manny had some of the fastest feet ever, yet JMM kept up with him well. Brook and Porter present problems because they're much bigger than JMM and in their primes. Nothing more, nothing less.

Might as well end the thread now i guess!!

THIS!

[FlatLine]

Broner would have no chance against Marquez - zero.

Brook and Porter would be interesting fights though. Definitely a major step up for Brook compared to his last few opponents so he might be in too deep water against Marquez. Also a step up from fighting Broner for Porter.

[Psylence83]

well i mean he has pacs number down and pac is a pretty much a brawler when he was fighting marquez back to back so it doesnt shock me to see marquezs do well against him and also,,theres no doubt in my mind that broner beats the brakes off marquezs,does it very easy to all he has to do is use the mayweather blueprint,

Broner can't do anything like may. Need to stop with that comparison bro.

[LacedUp]

Does anybody think he'll beat Brook?

He'd get spanked around the ring like a kid if he was to step into the ring with the special one.

[La Coka]

Agree Marquez does not like fighters that move. Brook beats every name mentioned there and looks very good in doing it. This guys power is unreal, look at porters face post fight. He didn't get the knock out but you get the feeling if he went for it he could have taken hi out.

[revs1227]

brook no .....broner yes porter maybe

[MRBOOMER]

Remove Broner from that list and you may be right. But to suggest the Marquez only does well against flat-flooted brawlers shows how little you know about boxing. Prime Manny had some of the fastest feet ever, yet JMM kept up with him well. Brook and Porter present problems because they're much bigger than JMM and in their primes. Nothing more, nothing less.

He had/has fast feet but doesn't use them defensively it's to get in and out with fast hard shots at weird angles. Even when he's on the way out you know where he's gonna be because he wants to stay in range him self.