whether they get votes or not isn't relevant. what is relevant is you keeping your personal biases out of the thread by including them since they did fight last month.
Often fighters included in the poll do not get votes.
Had you not left them off intentionally, there would've been nothing for me to criticize. The very fair and factual criticism forced you to beg the mods to delete the previous thread and for you to make another thread.
You left off others as well, all in the hopes of gerrymandering a win for Kov.
Geez Tunney, you shoot your own self in the foot with your ridiculous bigotry time and time again.
Not sure why bold is true, if they didn't get votes it means they probably weren't really much of a candidate for Boxer of the Month and therefore wouldn't have been a very big deal if they had been excluded.
Winning on the road is good, but Frampton was knocked down twice and went the distance with a limited opponent.
I said "a" not "the".
He won impressively KO3.
But I didn't vote for him.
I honestly tried to be ********ic, objective and fair.
I even made a new poll and thread.
What more do you want?
1 - Agreed, Frampton had a decent comeback but this was an opponent where I expected much more from Frampton. Definitely not a boxer of the month caliber performance imho.
Keith Thurman however held himself together and stayed on his feet after taking a nasty liver shot but otherwise dominated the match. The stoppage was ugly but I'd say it's far to say he is worthy of being on the list but still couldn't possibly win be the winner anyway.
2- You'd think that'd be enough, eh? Lol I'm amused at how visceral the reaction was to you making up for not including some fighters on the list..
Taking into account the standard of quality of the win, the significance of the fight and the expectations going into the fight I think the three strongest candidates are Cuenca, Quigg and Abraham. I voted for Quigg.
Comment