Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kell Brook vs Chris Van Heerden!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Khan puts out Van Heerden's name. Khantards rampantly start talking about Van Heerden as Brook's next opponent.

    It is what it is, unless his uncle gave you the idea while you were suckin him off for cab fares?
    People in the industry hear things. Not the thread is about Khan.

    It's good to see your true self come out when Brook gets criticized. We all know when the shoe is on other foot with you folk its "lacist".

    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Step up to who? Devon?

    Considering he schooled the guy who bashed up Devon, I don't think that would be much of a step up.
    Triangle theories, is that what you'll resort to? Styles make fights. DSG struggled with Peterson who got KOed by Lucas in 3, yet Danny took care of him fairly easily.

    Comment


    • #52
      No surprises here

      Hearn once again linking his fighters to big names when he knows fights cannot be made through the media, if brook or hearn had any will in fighting khan, they would actually try to talk to him instead of running their mouth on sky sports.

      Once again, he is fooling the public and ******s like brook diggler lap it up on here

      The hearn promotional strategy:
      step 1: go to press with a name
      step 2: have no intention in making the fight and put road blocks in
      step 3: pick a bum and then accuse the big name of ducking

      brook is a fraud and everyone knows it, even brook diggler does, hence him being on damage control right away here

      Comment


      • #53
        Hmmm, well, it is certainly a step up from Gavin professionally speaking because Frankie was a WW due to his nutrition (takeaways). Van Heerden is a proper WW. Unlike No No Dan who does happen to be a WW, Heerden held the IBO WW "World" title. The promotion for this fight will be cracking because both have Magic Matthew as a common opponent.


        Also if Carson Jones takes care of Brian Rose again, he may come down to put his name in the Kell Brook sweepstakes along with Bundu, Van Heerden and Sam Eggington.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
          People in the industry hear things. Not the thread is about Khan.

          It's good to see your true self come out when Brook gets criticized. We all know when the shoe is on other foot with you folk its "lacist".
          People in the industry like who? Look at this puppet playing dumb lol. Khan mentions Van Heerden and Bundu in an interview out of sheer desperation and two of the biggest, most shameless Khanturds on this board instantly make threads about it

          Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
          Triangle theories, is that what you'll resort to? Styles make fights. DSG struggled with Peterson who got KOed by Lucas in 3, yet Danny took care of him fairly easily.
          I didn't use a triangle theory you mong. I said Devon wouldn't be a "step-up" considering he already beat Porter. Of course Khanturds think Devon is amazing right now but would then say he was shot or Khan's leftovers if Brook faced him.

          Just like how Khan tried to fight M.Hatton and Senchenko then slagged them both off after Brook beat them

          Acting just like your idol. Puppet.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
            No surprises here

            Hearn once again linking his fighters to big names when he knows fights cannot be made through the media, if brook or hearn had any will in fighting khan, they would actually try to talk to him instead of running their mouth on sky sports.

            Once again, he is fooling the public and ******s like brook diggler lap it up on here

            The hearn promotional strategy:
            step 1: go to press with a name
            step 2: have no intention in making the fight and put road blocks in
            step 3: pick a bum and then accuse the big name of ducking

            brook is a fraud and everyone knows it, even brook diggler does, hence him being on damage control right away here
            Exactly this! this basically sums up brooks career

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
              No surprises here

              Hearn once again linking his fighters to big names when he knows fights cannot be made through the media, if brook or hearn had any will in fighting khan, they would actually try to talk to him instead of running their mouth on sky sports.
              Khan and his team refuse to even talk about the Brook fight. They won't even discuss terms

              Comment


              • #57
                Wait a minute, brook hasn't announced an opponent yet, neither has Floyd? Can only mean one thing....Brook Gavin II

                Joke, don't cry Dirk.

                Chaves fits the Hearn criteria though:
                1. He's cheap.
                2. South American.
                3. Already lost to main rivals.
                4. He's cheap.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  People in the industry like who? Look at this puppet playing dumb lol. Khan mentions Van Heerden and Bundu in an interview out of sheer desperation and two of the biggest, most shameless Khanturds on this board instantly make threads about it



                  I didn't use a triangle theory you mong. I said Devon wouldn't be a "step-up" considering he already beat Porter. Of course Khanturds think Devon is amazing right now but would then say he was shot or Khan's leftovers if Brook faced him.

                  Just like how Khan tried to fight M.Hatton and Senchenko then slagged them both off after Brook beat them

                  Acting just like your idol. Puppet.
                  He was looking at them as a WW debut/catch weight before fighting a proper WW. Kell had been at WW for about all of his career, when he fought them. Big difference. Also his last fight was Frankie Gavin.

                  At the end he didn't fight them, so there is that.
                  Last edited by Box-Office; 07-25-2015, 01:37 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                    He was looking at them as a WW debut. Kell had been at WW for about all of his career. Big difference.

                    At the end he didn't fight them, so there is that.
                    Brookturds don't understand the concept of context.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                      He was looking at them as a WW debut. Kell had been at WW for about all of his career. Big difference.

                      At the end he didn't fight them, so there is that.
                      Big difference? Either a fighter is good or he isn't.

                      Khan didn't fight them because Brook smashed them. Suddenly they became crap opponents. Would be the same story with Devon.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP