Kell Brook vs Chris Van Heerden!

[LacedUp]

No surprises here

Hearn once again linking his fighters to big names when he knows fights cannot be made through the media, if brook or hearn had any will in fighting khan, they would actually try to talk to him instead of running their mouth on sky sports.

Once again, he is fooling the public and ******s like brook diggler lap it up on here

The hearn promotional strategy:
step 1: go to press with a name
step 2: have no intention in making the fight and put road blocks in
step 3: pick a bum and then accuse the big name of ducking

brook is a fraud and everyone knows it, even brook diggler does, hence him being on damage control right away here

Absolutely ******ed post.

[LacedUp]

You would've rated Brook on par with Jan Zavcek if the boy from Bolton hadn't made it big and had Kell use his name to stay relevant.

Probably the corniest fanboy on the forum.

Brook has been ranked above Khan for ages, even before Porter. But he did happen to beat Porter for the title, which is better than anything Khan has done. Ever.

Brook is simply the better fighter. He doesn't get knocked down by 37 year old lightweights and run all around the ring like a headless chicken, only to afterwards claim "Floyd is ducking".

Yet there you are. absolutely cringey.