Larry Holmes says he can still beat Wladimir Klitschko although he's age 65
Collapse
-
-
A 65 year Holmes soils himself once the bell rings lol. And I think they both beat him at 38, younger version is a competitive fight.Comment
-
People say weird things when they are punched in the head for a living. Add in the old age and it equals delusional.Comment
-
Larry Holmes is a bitter old man, and yet again he exposes himself as a total dimwit. Last time he said Vlad has no jab, or something along those linesComment
-
Comment
-
-
Old retired great fighters sometimes think they can do things that they could not even come close to doing. Holmes can train his ass off for as long as he wants but he will still be 65 years old. At that age everybody is just a shell of what they were 35 years ago. He would not last 60 seconds with the champ. No 65 year old would. Getting old sucks but it's part of life. When Vlad is 65 he won't be any good either. There is a time for fighting and age 65 is not the time. Wlad might beat Holmes even if they were the same age. He is a good fighting champ and doesn't deserve all the disrespect he gets. Nobody has beat him in a long time and he avoids no worthy challenger.Comment
-
No version of Larry Holmes could ever have won more than 2 rounds from Wladimir Klitschko.
In fact it is difficult to imagine any version of Larry Holmes surviving Klitschko.
I'm not counting Larry out here but it would be a significant feat for Larry to still be conscious after 12 rounds.Comment
-
Comment
Comment