Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko To Fight at Least Five More Times

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    you see what i'm about? you just made something up out of thin air. i always trash floyd for clinching/bending below the waist/using elbows. please pay attention instead of making things up. wlad is a cheater and bringing up someone who also cheats is a pretty lousy way of defending a cheater.
    Yea, you're about being a hating troll.

    The point is that it's not cheating otherwise he would be DQ'd or docked points, which he wasn't. The ref was smart enough to understand what was happening when you are not. Tall fighter vs. a shorter fighter running into him with his head down causes that to happen, genius.

    Look, you are an admitted hater of certain fighters so just STFU. Nobody cares about your deluded opinion.
    Last edited by Boxing Goat; 07-22-2015, 12:07 PM.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
      Still counts as he beat the second best HW's when he beat Chris Byrd and Sam Peter back in 2005/2006 so suck it. Vitali was retired at the time.
      Don't upset him, everybody loves a village idiot.

      Originally posted by yoz View Post
      It's the Brits more than anyone. A lot of them are still sore about Haye's departure from the scene and are hedging everything on AJ to dethrone Wlad.

      AJ is a fantastic prospect, sure, but labelling him 'heir' to Wladimir seems premature. There are other guys, such as Parker, who may also feature.
      Agreed.

      I like the look of Hughie F, Parker, Usyk and a few others too, as well as throwing Ortiz into the mix. Hughie especially, I quite like his ethics and application thus far.

      I'm being accused of being anti British because of my disdain towards the typical behaviour of recent British Klitschko opponents.

      Originally posted by daggum View Post
      even that is not even true. chagaev was the third best heavyweight when wlad beat him. to create a new lineage the #1 and #2 guys have to fight and vitali was #2 so what happened is they changed the rules for wlad. so yes if you believe in changing the rules and giving wlad special privileges he was lineal when he fought chagaev, if you follow the normal rules he only became lineal after beating povetkin(should have been dq'd)
      The butt hurt runs deep in this one. You want us to rustle up a whip around from the boys to buy you some scheriproct ?

      Scribes, fans alike and generally anybody and everybody associated within boxing accepts his numerical defences, yet you don't ! Lmfao.

      You seriously need to get over the fact Klitschko is and has been so dominate, that or find yourself another hobby, you have literally nothing positive to add to anything.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
        A lot of boys are getting themselves overly excited Joshua is to be the one who can defeat Wlad, personally I'm not convinced and if Wlad is to fight 5 more times and Joshua as he hopes to fight for a title next year they are almost certainly on a collision course themselves.

        Wilder is the only intangible here, personally I feel Wilder will unify before facing Povetkin, I believe their is a lot of money to be made for both himself and Wlad in what will likely be a ppv attraction, Wlad hasn't been showing his face to the Americans with his three fight deal with HBO and his last fight in MSG.

        Writing Wilder off as you do I don't believe does him or any of his fans any favours. Wilder has as much power as Joshua and against Stiverne proved he can in fact box and hasn't the chin of Amir Khan and David Price. It's an interesting fight as much as the Fury one IMO, will I consider it a top five win ?no I will not as I won't a win over Fury either, but it all goes some way to establishing himself further as an ATG and obviously a HOF entrant, their is fast becoming a case for him to be considered better still !
        Yes your probably right Scott and I'm probably a bit over harsh on old Wilder, I WOULD change my tune about the guy if he legitimately fights and beats a good top HW!

        I mean the guy is an ACTUAL HW champ now and only claim to legitimacy is beating a critically ill hospital patient who he FAILED to knock out in 36 minutes of fighting.

        And we can credit HIM for SURVIVING right?

        Sorry if I'm not convinced yet.

        Yes, I'm sure Wilder vs Klitschko (or Povetkin) will be big fights and nothing I or anyone really says will take that away anyway.

        I would consider a Wilder victory a good win of course, nowhere near a top win though.

        Comment


        • #44
          And another thing Scott, it wouldn't really bother me if Wladimir opted to fight Joshua as one of his last defences,

          JUST SO LONG AS he gives Povetkin another crack.

          I see no other boxer who really deserves a second chance.

          The way I see it, if your gonna continue to reign as the absolute monarch of the sport then you should set aside petty squabbles like Joshua if they get in the way of the fights that REALLY matter.

          If he no longer see's himself worthy of facing Povetkin as HW champ, then he should hang up the gloves. If he does, then Povetkin rematch would be the correct thing to do.

          Just my thoughts on the situation.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP