Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Rejects Rehydration Clause For Rigondeaux

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #31
    Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
    What does one have to do with the other...?

    Rehydration clause isnt the same as a catchweight. DURF.
    I don't agree with catchweights or rehydration clauses.

    Many great fighters have been able to move up in weight without them.

    I consider Rigondeaux one of the best I've ever seen so it's disappointing he'd make these silly demands.

    Comment

    • nivek535
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 2685
      • 104
      • 212
      • 9,740

      #32
      people claiming rigo is so godly and takes anyone to school 122-126.....
      if hes so damn good he wouldnt need no negotiations on weights...

      Comment

      • .:: JSFD26 ::.
        Brawski
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 33329
        • 725
        • 432
        • 44,762

        #33
        Originally posted by nivek535
        people claiming rigo is so godly and takes anyone to school 122-126.....
        if hes so damn good he wouldnt need no negotiations on weights...
        If Lomachenko is so good why doesnt he face Walters even if "he's too big"?

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #34
          Originally posted by HanzGruber
          Yea but he rehydrated to like 147 and every one kept saying "he's a welterweight!" But only 10 pounds bigger than loma lol. Just like I said in the thread sky sports is full of shlt per usual
          Well I'm speaking for myself and Salido didn't make weight which was unprofessional. I don't really care what he rehydrated to. He didn't strain himself to make weight.

          Don't you find it hypocritical that you're supporting Rigondeax's weight demands yet are ****ting on Golovkin for his?

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #35
            Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
            If Lomachenko is so good why doesnt he face Walters even if "he's too big"?
            He's said when he moves to 130, he'll fight Walters. No catchweights, no rehydration clauses.

            Comment

            • Bigg Rigg
              The People's Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2013
              • 11387
              • 280
              • 58
              • 20,735

              #36
              Originally posted by Cruisin'
              It's 4 lbs against a guy with 5 pro fights... Just do it
              Rigo couldn't get anyone interested in fighting him for like two yrs. Lomachenko comes knocking and now it's a cw and rehydration clause. If the fight falls apart I don't wanna hear **** from Rigo and his team.

              Comment

              • turnedup
                Boxing fan since 1985
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2012
                • 10383
                • 1,935
                • 585
                • 53,504

                #37
                Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
                If Lomachenko is so good why doesnt he face Walters even if "he's too big"?
                Because clearly the man you speak of is practically a welterweight on fight night...let's all act like they didn't learn a lesson from the salido fight about being outweighed, especially by a power puncher like walters. Ten to Twelve pound advantages on fight night at lower weights makes a significant difference. No wonder Walters been knocking out fools left and right, let's see if the carries up in weight...doubt he's a knockout machine at 135 or higher.

                Comment

                • Doctor_Tenma
                  Monster
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 33313
                  • 1,327
                  • 1,249
                  • 58,127

                  #38
                  Lomachenko is too big for Rigondeaux, I'm sure Rigo realizes this himself. It's one thing to face someone that's just bigger but Lomachenko will touch Rigondeaux as well.

                  Comment

                  • puro dinamita
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Feb 2013
                    • 894
                    • 31
                    • 100
                    • 8,271

                    #39
                    Rigo need to shut that mouth of his if he wants fights he's not in the driver seat loma is

                    Comment

                    • Doctor_Tenma
                      Monster
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 33313
                      • 1,327
                      • 1,249
                      • 58,127

                      #40
                      Originally posted by turnedup
                      Because clearly the man you speak of is practically a welterweight on fight night...let's all act like they didn't learn a lesson from the salido fight about being outweighed, especially by a power puncher like walters. Ten to Twelve pound advantages on fight night at lower weights makes a significant difference. No wonder Walters been knocking out fools left and right, let's see if the carries up in weight...doubt he's a knockout machine at 135 or higher.
                      It was more of his inability to fight on the inside and his reluctance to retaliate to Salido's dirtiness, that and an incompetent ref. Weight hardly played a role.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP