Who should be ranked higher p4p?

**Chuckguy** · 07-20-2015, 05:51 PM

Same / of thread

**Sugar Adam Ali** · 07-20-2015, 05:53 PM

Kovolev by far....

It's a joke that Golovkin is ahead of kovolev...

Kovolev has dominant wins over pascal and hopkins.. Golovkin has nothing like that on his resume.. The Murray win is not as good...

Golovkin should be ranked 8-10, and kovolev is more of a 4-7 ranking

**Jc8804** · 07-20-2015, 05:53 PM

Kovalev has the better resume. He is clearly top 10 p4p. How wrd is stil in the top 10 after all that inactivity and poor competition is
a joke.

**Jewish-Reptile** · 07-20-2015, 05:54 PM

Krusher easily. GGG looks sound but the manner of the Hopkins win alone is better than Rubio, Geale and Murray wins put together.

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 07-20-2015, 05:56 PM

Kovalev obviously

**$0uthpaw** · 07-20-2015, 05:58 PM

Kovalev because he's been just as dominant as GGG and he has a legend on his resume for good measure.

**nivek535** · 07-20-2015, 06:12 PM

i kinda like ggg a tiny bit better, but kovalev has the better resume... so................... yep.

hoping ggg lands cotto nelo or something big soon...

**BigAlexSand** · 07-20-2015, 06:15 PM

It is a difficult one to decide without a fanboy/hater type attidude. Personally both have equally good resumes but far from great. Kovalev has the small satisfaction of beating a legend in Hopkins and did so quite easily and Gennady only misses out on that specific part of his resume is a legend type fighter. Saying that does one win against Pascal, mean more than Murray or Rubio? Does the win against Cleverly mean more than Macklin or Stevens?

I'll go with Kovalev just based of Hopkins but it's not a big difference in my view... Then again Kovalev has also had the lesser of the fights.

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 07-20-2015, 06:19 PM

Originally posted by BigAlexSand

It is a difficult one to decide without a fanboy/hater type attidude. Personally both have equally good resumes but far from great. Kovalev has the small satisfaction of beating a legend in Hopkins and did so quite easily and Gennady only misses out on that specific part of his resume is a legend type fighter. Saying that does one win against Pascal, mean more than Murray or Rubio? Does the win against Cleverly mean more than Macklin or Stevens?

I'll go with Kovalev just based of Hopkins but it's not a big difference in my view... Then again Kovalev has also had the lesser of the fights.

Hopkins and Pascal are way better than any wins on Golovkin's resume.

It's not even debatable.

Who should be ranked higher p4p?