Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Froch on 'Bitter' Calzaghe: My Stats Smash His To Bits!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by job43 View Post
    Joe was amazing in the ring but him boasting about beating Jones Jr when he did was Like when Zsu beat Chavez Sr. Other than that who did Joe fight? Lacey? Hopkins was a good win although a prime Hopkins probably wins. I think Froch is what is good with boxing and Joe is what is wrong with boxing. Go out and fight everybody win or lose. Froch had the better boxing career
    When was PRIME Hopkins? Had wins over Tarver and Pavlik between loss to Joe..ever hear of Mikkel Kessler? He was undefeated and a beast B4 Joe beat him..

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by ddeg10 View Post
      Froch could have ended his career on a high note with a big name which would have cemented his legacy much better than it is today. Ending your career fighting some guy barely anyone has heard of twice (Groves) and calling that a world class opponent is far from ideal. Calzaghe dominated his opponents, Froch was always in competitive fights that in many cases could have gone either way. Calzaghe would have knocked him out.
      State-side, Groves was known over here.

      He'll be better known in the US if he can beat Jack in Vegas for the WBC next month.

      Comment


      • #13
        Hmm can't agree with Froch on this one, Calzaghe defeated a prime Kessler, not a one eyed Kessler, Calzaghe also beat a prime, well early 40's Hopkins in Vegas, the Lacy win, Bika in his prime, Jones Jnr was a bit shop worn but still a good win. Froch has good wins but Calzaghe was 46-0 for God's sake!

        Comment


        • #14
          i got to agree calzaghe does almost sound bitter when talking about froch and its a bit ridiculous

          Comment


          • #15
            They both seem a little bitter. Both had really good careers. I like Calzaghe if the two had ever fought, though.

            Comment


            • #16
              If i was given to chance to have had either Froch's or Calzaghe's career i would choose Froch's all day long.

              Comment


              • #17
                No, they don't, you coward. Calzaghe won't be remembered for ducking a top fighter either. Froch's legacy is now forever stained, will only be remembered for ducking Golovkin.

                Comment


                • #18
                  I'm disappointed in Carl making this statement. I think it's him who comes over as bitter. He's spoke about Calzaghe his whole career. I think there's a hint of jealousy.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Carl I've ran the numbers and Joe's career was 48% more successful then yours. You're not on Joe's level.

                    What's Carl's best win? Lucian Bootay? Lol please Joe came to the states and fought a prime Roy Jones Jr. and knocked him out.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Golovkin View Post
                      No, they don't, you coward. Calzaghe won't be remembered for ducking a top fighter either. Froch's legacy is now forever stained, will only be remembered for ducking Golovkin.
                      You're a laughing stock.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP