What makes you the A Side?
Collapse
-
-
I just gave you two names that separate the two.
It really isn't that hard to figure out.
Since you like lists so much, here is one that while I don't necessarily agree with in terms of placement, place Kovalev higher.
http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/
Lists are just that. Lists.
GGG has nothing on his resume to have him ahead of Kovalev, in my mind. Much less several spots ahead.Comment
-
Comment
-
Estrada > Kovalev and GGG doe? Lol shrug. Can't lie though, Kovalevs a monster and I'll agree that Pascal and even old ass BHop were better victories individually than any of GGGs. Don't think they eclipse GGGs consistent brutal destruction of somewhat less solid opposition.. but we can agree to disagree.I just gave you two names that separate the two.
It really isn't that hard to figure out.
Since you like lists so much, here is one that while I don't necessarily agree with in terms of placement, place Kovalev higher.
http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/
Lists are just that. Lists.
GGG has nothing on his resume to have him ahead of Kovalev, in my mind. Much less several spots ahead.Comment
-
Right on.Estrada > Kovalev and GGG doe? Lol shrug. Can't lie though, Kovalevs a monster and I'll agree that Pascal and even old ass BHop were better victories individually than any of GGGs. Don't think they eclipse GGGs consistent brutal destruction of somewhat less solid opposition.. but we can agree to disagree.
Glad we could shake penises like two adult men, and sort it out.Comment
-
Yeah but if that activity is against Paul Smith style bums then he doesn't deserve to be in there...boxing has moved on in the last 19 months. GGG, Kovalev, Gonzalez and co all have better claim being in the p4p. But Ward still probably gets ranked back in...which just goes to show you how ridiculous p4p rankings can be.Comment
-
Paul Smith (two-time world title challenger) was a better opponent than basically every fight on Golovkin's resume, and his rise up the p4p list hasn't been hampered much by the **** competition.Yeah but if that activity is against Paul Smith style bums then he doesn't deserve to be in there...boxing has moved on in the last 19 months. GGG, Kovalev, Gonzalez and co all have better claim being in the p4p. But Ward still probably gets ranked back in...which just goes to show you how ridiculous p4p rankings can be.Comment
-
A side is all about how many seats you fill. Ratings popularity it has nothing to do with skill. GGG is a side when it comes to Ward easy. Put him against Froch in the UK and he becomes b side. Against Cotto and Canelo he is b side. Ward is only a side against the scrubs of the world. Against kovo it's pretty evenJust keen to see people's opinions on this?
Seeing as GGG has acclaimed himself the A side vs Ward? . . . But has he even earned the right to do so yet?
He has higher viewing numbers I think (correct me if I'm wrong) but has accomplished less. So who is the A side and what makes them that?. . . I know there's some obvious answers to this, but let's just have a discussion for the sake of it.Comment
-
It's not about resumes it's about who brings in more revenue. Resume is probably the last thing that is looked atI just gave you two names that separate the two.
It really isn't that hard to figure out.
Since you like lists so much, here is one that while I don't necessarily agree with in terms of placement, place Kovalev higher.
http://www.tbrb.org/p4p/
Lists are just that. Lists.
GGG has nothing on his resume to have him ahead of Kovalev, in my mind. Much less several spots ahead.Comment

Comment