Would do you consider a better trainer between Nacho Beristein and Freddie Roach

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juandabomb
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 2629
    • 107
    • 0
    • 21,659

    #11
    Originally posted by AddiX
    That's a respectable answer, I didn't even know he trained Lopez.

    Roach has built a lot of careers that probably didn't exist without him, also saved a lot of careers. Cotto being the latest career he's revived.

    A lot of people Domt give as much respect to trainers who pick u fighters later in there careers. But thats an extremely hard skill IMO.

    Especially in Roaches case, as he tends to make fighters more offensive minded.

    Unlike nacho who has worked with his guys for years, Roach has to break fighters old bad habits, one of the hardest things to do in boxing.
    roach is overrated.saved cottos career by putting him in vs b level Rodriguez,double knee surgery crippled Martinez,& a weight drained dry pale Geale

    Comment

    • Mr.Fantastic
      .............
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 7171
      • 318
      • 894
      • 14,672

      #12
      Nacho easily.

      Comment

      • therealpugilist
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2012
        • 14612
        • 561
        • 4
        • 45,735

        #13
        Roach admittedly puts his guys in with guys not at their best


        Look at who his fighters fight


        I dock points for that....nacho ain't as well known, beloved or sought Out but he has the best resume of any active trainer today....r.I.p. My dude Manny steward

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP