These people a butt hurt children whose hero got exposed as a phoney don't forget that , I cant be bothered responding to them any more , its easy when you remind yourself how ridiculously childish they are , if you were to see them in real life you would laugh your head off .
Comments Thread For: Calzaghe: Pacquiao Allowed Mayweather To Dictate Pace
Collapse
-
I think Floyd fans know Floyds win over Pac is controversial in so many ways, on so many levels, more so than any fight between Pac v JMM ever was.
Otherwise they wouldnt be so vocal, replying to everything and anything with damage control and limitation in the forefront of their minds. Youd think that Floyd still having his zero would mean everything to them as much as it does to floyd. But no, thats not enough, they want Floyd to have credibility for the win as well. They know that not possible at this stage.
They care so much what Floyd critics think and say, thats how sensitive an issue this is for them......yes they are guilty.Give Pac the rematch and then things can be put into perspective more.Last edited by hugh grant; 07-07-2015, 05:09 AM.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
There's no controversy about the fight. I think people are vocal because they can't believe some fans are trying to claim a Pacquiao victory. These same fans tried to find a million ways to discredit Marquez's KO over Pacquiao. I think you have it backwards. It's the Pacquiao fans that are so invested in him that they cannot fathom him losing to anyone, especially not Mayweather.I think Floyd fans know Floyds win over Pac is controversial in so many ways, on so many levels, more so than any fight between Pac v JMM ever was.
Otherwise they wouldnt be so vocal, replying to everything and anything with damage control and limitation in the forefront of their minds. Youd think that Floyd still having his zero would mean everything to them as much as it does to floyd. But no, thats not enough, they want Floyd to have credibility for the win as well. They know that not possible at this stage.
They care so much what Floyd critics think and say, thats how sensitive an issue this is for them......yes they are guilty.Give Pac the rematch and then things can be put into perspective more.Comment
-
2 rounds.. Jeez, this runner is really exposed. The guy didn't get a convincing rounds in except for that 2 rounds aye.. P4p best paper champ lolThe only rounds Floyd won convincingly were 1 and 5. Every other round he supposedly won were swing rounds that could have gone either way, but it's no surprise that they were "given" (emphasis on given) to Fraud based on the unspoken fact that the NSAC has a personal stake in his success.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hand raised.....
Let me answer that. Chico is STILL Floyd's biggest win to date. The Cotto win was a legacy win. The Oscar win was a legacy win, even though Oscar was not primed and a part time Promoter at the time. In both those fights against Cotto and Oscar, Floyd was unimpressive. The Cotto win was a good one though. But he was supposed to dominate and stop Cotto. He talks a lot but doesn't back it up. Against Oscar, he was in his prime and still couldn't dominate a washed up Oscar. Through 8 rounds, I had Oscar up a round. Floyd swept 9-12 once Oscar got tired. Now, that was the best that he could fight. He hasn't gotten better since the Oscar fight. So, I would say that 95% of his opponents, have been overmatched. The only two fights he ever fought that he truly could have lost once the fight started, were against Cotto and Pacquiao. Cotto got tired and Manny got robbed BIG TIME. Floyd was exposed in both fights. Why? Because Cotto and Manny are the only two A Level fighters he's ever fought when they had something left. If he was so great, he would've dominated Cotto and Manny. Manny was smaller. shorter reach, and INJURED. Floyd still got out landed. So, my question to you then becomes, how great is he REALLY?Comment
-
What a pathetic individual.Let me answer that. Chico is STILL Floyd's biggest win to date. The Cotto win was a legacy win. The Oscar win was a legacy win, even though Oscar was not primed and a part time Promoter at the time. In both those fights against Cotto and Oscar, Floyd was unimpressive. The Cotto win was a good one though. But he was supposed to dominate and stop Cotto. He talks a lot but doesn't back it up. Against Oscar, he was in his prime and still couldn't dominate a washed up Oscar. Through 8 rounds, I had Oscar up a round. Floyd swept 9-12 once Oscar got tired. Now, that was the best that he could fight. He hasn't gotten better since the Oscar fight. So, I would say that 95% of his opponents, have been overmatched. The only two fights he ever fought that he truly could have lost once the fight started, were against Cotto and Pacquiao. Cotto got tired and Manny got robbed BIG TIME. Floyd was exposed in both fights. Why? Because Cotto and Manny are the only two A Level fighters he's ever fought when they had something left. If he was so great, he would've dominated Cotto and Manny. Manny was smaller. shorter reach, and INJURED. Floyd still got out landed. So, my question to you then becomes, how great is he REALLY?
The sooner you come to terms with the fact Mayweather beat Pacquaio (fairly easily) the better.Comment
-
Comment



Comment