Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Top Rank Sues Al Haymon For Over $100 Million
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dolezal View PostI posted in the thread about venues being reserved so other promoters couldn't use them as violating unfair competition law. Those idiots fetta and big dunn said "all in da game." "Dat's how bidness works doe." "It's cutthroat doe."
Now it's "all sour g****s doe." "Dey just h8ers."
These allegations are serious. They could be countersued if they were frivolous. Read the complaint, it's around 50 pages. Educate yourself instead of blindly defending Haymon.
I suspect that the claim was brought forward in an attempt to draw Al Haymon out in the open. It's possible that they are hoping his defence will reveal he is acting as both agent and promoter. All that needs be said is that the fighter was not able to honour the date given, but it could be problematic if he lets slip that he is acting as both manager and promoter.
Seeing as Haymon has a team of lawyers with more relevant legal knowledge than myself, I doubt a careless slip up like that will occur.
Comment
-
Dan Rafael ;@danrafaelespn · 30m30 minutes ago
We have posted 50-page lawsuit @trboxing filed vs Haymon & Waddell & Reed if you want a little light summer reading:
http://a.espncdn.com/pdf/2015/0701/T...nLawsuit_r.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by MC Hammer View PostI don't get how the Ali act works here? I thought that was a fighters protection against a promoter. The fighters aren't really even signed to a contract binding them to Haymon, they can leave when they want like Andre Dirrell did some time back. Can't wait to see how this plays out. Hopefully Haymon keeps the court process going on and on, while TR/GB makes limited profit until they eventually have to give up.
The Ali Act push came about because folks saw what Don King was doing to fighters, and the government finally stepped up to try and curtail that.
Ali Act made it illegal for a fighter's manager to work for a promoter (since the manager is the only party with an enforceable fiduciary duty to the fighter) and it made it illegal for a manager to also stage the fight/promote a fighter (think Carl Frampton being managed by Barry McGuigan, while also fighting for Barry McGuigan's promotional company, Cyclone Promotions).
It's funny how Haymon being on the verge of re-visioning the sport of boxing has so many people, out in public, standing up for and defending an admitted liar and crook.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostJust bringing their colour and religion into it is racist. Neither should have any bearing on the case in court or here on this message board. I notice your location is Germany, should I refer to you as a blond Aryan?Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail View PostNo it's not, Haymon is a black man and Arum is a *** and the ***s control the media and the world of sports. Don't believe me go to this website:
https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-con...sional-sports/
again I didn't say anything bad about anybody, I'm just saying facts, u guys are just too sensitive about this whole race thing, normal people talk about these things all over the world without getting called racist, freedom of speech my ass.
No I'm not a blonde aryan, I'm an african! and NO I'm not a ****** and no I don't hate ***s, but still they're in control of everything.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostMaybe you dont understand the implications here? If the suit is correct, Haymon is driving out all competitors by overpaying everybody. This will in time put other promotors out of business and suddenly Haymon has a monopoly. In a monopoly its the monopolist who sets the prices.
Is that a good thing?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FeFist View PostCan you prove that the dates were reserved with the intention of preventing other promoters from using the date? The dates were cancelled but it could be explained away as not being able to honour the date.
I suspect that the claim was brought forward in an attempt to draw Al Haymon out in the open. It's possible that they are hoping his defence will reveal he is acting as both agent and promoter. All that needs be said is that the fighter was not able to honour the date given, but it could be problematic if he lets slip that he is acting as both manager and promoter.
Seeing as Haymon has a team of lawyers with more relevant legal knowledge than myself, I doubt a careless slip up like that will occur.
You should read up on the adversarial system. American jurisprudence is a bit different than whatever country you're in.Last edited by Dolezal; 07-01-2015, 05:21 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail View PostNo it's not, Haymon is a black man and Arum is a *** and the ***s control the media and the world of sports. Don't believe me go to this website:
https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-con...sional-sports/
again I didn't say anything bad about anybody, I'm just saying facts, u guys are just too sensitive about this whole race thing, normal people talk about these things all over the world without getting called racist, freedom of speech my ass.
No I'm not a blonde aryan, I'm an african! and NO I'm not a ****** and no I don't hate ***s, but still they're in control of everything.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail View PostSo any black man bringing up the issue of race nowadays is automatically a racist? I didn't say anything racist at all, I said let's see if the successful black man can win a ridicoulus case against a white ***, I didn't say anything bad about anybody, calling a white *** a white *** is not a racial slur.
Comment
Comment