Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Khans resume compared to Thurman

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by king4oranges View Post
    Khans resume ****s all over Thurman resume. Thurman has been fighting bums after bums except the Guerrero fight. This guy hasn't beaten a prime fighter or even been in the ring with them. Just like Paulie said "there's always levels in boxing Of course your gonna look good fight a dishwasher". Thurman is no where near khans class until he proves otherwise. Talk is cheap
    Khan has a better resume than Thurman. So does Danny Garcia. And guess what??? At the moment that don't mean **** cuz their stocks have dropped significantly!!! And in a fight right now, I favor Thurman to pummel Danny and Knock out Khan.
    Last edited by Bigg Rigg; 06-27-2015, 04:29 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Why are people even mentioning Thurman's name in the same sentence as King Khan? One is a special talent and the other is a 5 foot 7 midget American hypejob just like Adrien Broner and Shawn Porter.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Monaco View Post
        Why are people even mentioning Thurman's name in the same sentence as King Khan? One is a special talent and the other is a 5 foot 7 midget American hypejob just like Adrien Broner and Shawn Porter.
        +1

        Broner is talented but can't discipline himself and is, therefore, not good.

        Porter is over-rated.

        Thurman is over-rated and untested with a **** resume.

        Khan is a special talent.

        Comment


        • #34
          Khans refuse is better... Sadley, not a huge difference And Thurman is yet to be exposed S did Khan early and later. If you truly look, not a huge difference besides win against Miadana. I personally think Thurman has the skills to put down Marcus Miadana.

          A win against past greats in Judah and Mallingnagi ("great" is being kind). His WW resume is as good as Thurman.

          Comment


          • #35
            It isn't just who you fight that makes a resume good or bad. How you do in those fights makes a huge difference. Both Thurman and Khan fought Diaz not too far apart in time. Khan had to get off the floor to win a close home country decision while Thurman easily knocked out Diaz in 3 rounds. Khan was flattened in 60 seconds by unranked Prescott. Does anybody think Thurman would lose to Prescott??? Khan was knocked out in 4 rounds by Garcia. If Garcia was fighting Thurman guess who the betting favorite to win would be. Khan lost to Peterson. Again Thurman would be a huge favorite to beat Peterson. How about Algieri? Does anybody think Thurman would not KO Algieri or at least beat the hell out of him. Thurman has KOed his share of top 10 contenders and most importantly he has never lost or even been in a close fight. He has dominated all his opponents. So Thurman's resume ****s all over Khan's resume with his 3 losses and two KO defeats and his close fight with Diaz. It's clear Thurman would fight Khan anytime and it's clear Khan will never fight Thurman. What does that tell you?

            Comment


            • #36
              When comparing resumes between Khan and Thurman are you guys also including the fact that Khan got knocked the fk out twice in his career and also lost to Peterson?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by PulpFriction View Post
                When comparing resumes between Khan and Thurman are you guys also including the fact that Khan got knocked the fk out twice in his career and also lost to Peterson?
                They try not to think of the KO's... Makes Khan fans prone to self destruction. The Peterson fight, on the other hand they scream bloody murder of Robbery. Though a close fight, Peterson exposed Khans distaste for fighter on the inside.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Amir Khans 147lb resume is not to brag about. Also Brooks WW win over Porter> Khans WW resume. Thurman also had no trouble beating Diaz, when Khan went life and death. Khan has yet to fight one puncher.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View Post
                    Amir Khans 147lb resume is not to brag about. Also Brooks WW win over Porter> Khans WW resume. Thurman also had no trouble beating Diaz, when Khan went life and death. Khan has yet to fight one puncher.
                    Neither has Brook in 11 years.

                    Glass jawed joke Khan when he was champ fought and beat the biggest puncher in his division.

                    Brook has yet to face a puncher in over a decade, there is a reason why he is calling out a glass jawed feather fisted faded blown up lightweight.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      The difference between the two is that Khan has fought several quality competitors. Thurman has fought one quality competitor. I don't think Khan has any chance of beating Floyd Mayweather. However, Thurman, with his poor resume, shouldn't even be mentioned as a potential opponent of Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP