Comments Thread For: Brook: Khan Wouldn't Live With Himself if a Brit Beat Him!

[Ray*]

The only similarity with Hatton annd Calzaghe is the fact that they're all British. Calzaghe was at the end of his career looking for big money fights and Froch was a nobody at the time.

Witter may have been world champion but wasn't even remotely a household name in Britain and was never regarded as a legitimate champion.

Khan is still in his 20's and Brook is a legitimate world champion with a large, growing fanbase packing out arenas every fight.

This fight would fill out Wembley and the only reason it's not happening is that Khan knows his glass chin can't take the power.

No same situations here. Nothing different, I call a spade a spade, both Joe and Hatton ducked there domestic main rival period!!! You can twist it which ever way you want and it would be the same outcome, Joe was fighting ashirass... Hatton was fighting cab drivers from lightweights, none of them too wanted to risk looking to their main domestic rivals because they wanted the big American payday.... Guess what? Same thing here with Amir Khan.

[Box-Office]

Desperation for what? I'm not the one supporting a hypocritical lying coward.

5:53. From your own video.

[Box-Office]

Still trying to recover from your exposure as possibly the most idiotic khan-tard ever. You're just too ****** to even understand your condition, which is why you persist in ignorance But by all means continue, its always fun to witness a train wreck in progress.

I guess. I'll just be happy to take a number following all the owning you're getting while defending your gi-joe hero Khan.

You're so ****** and ignorant wah wah wah. No argument, no nothing. Just name calling and whining. Same clueless muppet that couldn't read something as simple as comparing WBA interim with WBC Silver and not the latter with WBC interim.


That's enough. I'll stop tormenting you.

[LacedUp]

5:53. From your own video.

Khan in his latest interview: "The great thing about Amir Khan is that he's his own boss. I do things my way and I fight who I want to fight"

Interviewer: "If the Mayweather fight doesn't happen, is there any chance of you fighting Kell Brook?"

AK: "No. not a chance"

[Box-Office]

Box-Office will quietly try and admit that Khan is delusional and is ducking Brook. But then he'll divert the issue on to Kell's resume.

How is it "try" when I admit when he is wrong? I'm critical of Khan where it's due. I have the integrity to admit when he's wrong. Not because I'm here to appease people unlike Dirk who has to post "oh look at me I now hate Khan" in every thread.

Even to this day you don't see Bradley fans even slightly hinting their guy ducked Khan nor Cotto fans.

How is it a diversion when it's the truth? If anything arguably half the time it's you marching in every thread reminding people how the WW Haye, Porter will "maul" such and such due to which I got to intervene.

Nail on the head

At first you thought it'd be a big deal to hear me say Khan was ducking Brook. From day one I had no issues saying it because it is clear as day, but you realized you have f.ck all to go with, so you "quietly" move goal posts "you're not doing it enough" as if I'm here to appease anyone to begin with.


*waiting for your new party lines: OMG you sound emotional, someone ban him, take time off.*

[Box-Office]

And those are the only ones I need to smoke Khanturds out of the water. Khan said himself "He's proved himself 100%". He also said he'd fight Brook next after the porter fight, but he didn't think Brook would want to fight him this soon. Then when Brook called he was like "oh sht, he's not scared of me. Nah you don't deserve it. fight algieri to prove yourself"

Yeah, we've been through this and you know my answer, but of course it is too quiet for you.

Funny you mention jackiewicz - Weren't you the one who said something about McCloskey being on European level? Haha. jackiewicz was a European champion too! but he didn't fight him when he was a world champion like Khan.

Khan fought McCloskey in a homecoming bout, coming off of Maidana and fought Judah in unification afterwards. McCloskey also wasn't a shot gatekeeper, but an undefeated European champ at the time Khan took him on.

Kell had fought Jakiewicz in his 25th bout, now tell us who was Khan boxing in his 25th fight? Whom did he fight before and after?

No, he instead fought a FraNando's Gavin (who failed to become a European champ and barely got by Skeete) coming off of Bin Bin Man and now mostly going against Punching Bag Bag.

Khan a force? at what? If you take away the Mayweather/Brook war Khan has going on, he wouldn't be ranked in the top 5. The only reason he is is because the orgs want a payday.

No. Mayweather is a champ, Brook is a champ. Khan is nothing but a challenger who makes average fighters like Diaz and Algieri look like beasts. Algieri couldn't touch Brook if his life depended on it. He'd get smashed in 6 rounds. But now Khan is all: "you've got to fight Algieri".

Aaah I see, so they ranked Brook as mandatory challenger for the same reason then? The same orgs one of whom for which Kell is a champ?

Which segment? The ****** segment is about all he has left now. Even Johnny Nelson said on national television that he's making himself look foolish. There's not question Khan's popularity is at an all time low right now.

There's a new kid in town. His name is Ezekiel Brook.

I think we know he is.

This began with me arguing Brook made a name off of Khan or else he won't be relevant despite a belt. He'd be on par with Jan Zavcek. That's all.

[gmc_rfc_06]

Everybody knows the deal at this stage.

The usual 4-5 Khan lovers will try and deflect and try to change the subject (even going as far as to make up their own 'steroid' rumours) to try and take attention off of what is going on.

However, it's too late. Khan has made himself look and sound terrified of Brook and everyone knows it. The duck is as blatant as you will find.

[Phatfarm1980]

Brook is the Khan.....what Khan is to Mayweather. Chasing and name dropping

[LacedUp]

How is it "try" when I admit when he is wrong? I'm critical of Khan where it's due. I have the integrity to admit when he's wrong. Not because I'm here to appease people unlike Dirk who has to post "oh look at me I now hate Khan" in every thread.

Even to this day you don't see Bradley fans even slightly hinting their guy ducked Khan nor Cotto fans.

How is it a diversion when it's the truth? If anything arguably half the time it's you marching in every thread reminding people how the WW Haye, Porter will "maul" such and such due to which I got to intervene.

Because you follow your criticism of Khan up with: "But Brook.."

Did you say Cotto ducked Khan? Or what do you mean?

When have I ever compared Porter to Haye? You've said that a couple of times now, and I'm confused. I've never made a comparison between the two? Once I made a thread about Keith Thurman looking like a mini David Haye after his win over Soto-Karass.

But you for some reason keep mentioning Haye? And his fight with Enzo Mac also. For what reason?

[LacedUp]

Yeah, we've been through this and you know my answer, but of course it is too quiet for you.

Khan fought McCloskey in a homecoming bout, coming off of Maidana and fought Judah in unification afterwards. McCloskey also wasn't a shot gatekeeper, but an undefeated European champ at the time Khan took him on.

Kell had fought Jakiewicz in his 25th bout, now tell us who was Khan boxing in his 25th fight? Whom did he fight before and after?

No, he instead fought a FraNando's Gavin (who failed to become a European champ and barely got by Skeete) coming off of Bin Bin Man and now mostly going against Punching Bag Bag.

Aaah I see, so they ranked Brook as mandatory challenger for the same reason then? The same orgs one of whom for which Kell is a champ?

I think we know he is.

This began with me arguing Brook made a name off of Khan or else he won't be relevant despite a belt. He'd be on par with Jan Zavcek. That's all.

OK and how is McCloskey different from Jo Jo Dan or Frankie Gavin exactly? He came off a win against Barry Morrison (who?) and some guys I've never even heard off before facing Khan.

Did Brook also not have a "homecoming" fight against Jo Jo Dan who'd had wins over undefeated Bizier and a close fight with Aydin? How is he any different from McCloskey? Or Gavin who went the distance in a razor close fight with undefeated Bundu or beat an undefeated Bradley Skeete?

You can't see your double standards?

They ranked Brook as a mandatory challenger, because he fought his way through their ranks fighting guys they had highly ranked and fought eliminators and final eliminators.

WBC is an organization who Khan was never ranked by or had any of their belts and became mandatory after fighting Luis Collazo who was also not ranked in their organization?

Clearly the same doe

Yeah sure he would be on the level of Jan Zaveck That's why he just beat an unbeaten american welterweight champion.

Khan's own "boy" from Be Real TV said himself that Khan never beat anyone on Shawn Porter's level - Yet here you are.