who cares i was responding to the fact he only made 1.5 mill.
He didn't make much more than that. Every boxer can factor in other cash streams. You can also take money off for however much he pays Hunter and whatnot.
[QUOTE=Dirk Diggler UK;15827616]He didn't make much more than that. Every boxer can factor in other cash streams. You can also take money off for however much he pays Hunter and whatnot.
Yes and with most boxers, you look at their fight purses. You can throw in all the factors you want to add to it and there are just as many to take away from it.
The fight purse is the guide to what he roughly earned.
Yes and with most boxers, you look at their fight purses. You can throw in all the factors you want to add to it and there are just as many to take away from it.
The fight purse is the guide to what he roughly earned.
True though I remember Maidana fans disagreeing Khan got paid the same fighting on the Floyd undercard as Maidana got due to Argentine tv money despite the UK being a much richer country.
Pretty natural thing to do? Khan says he was moving up to 147 and Kell said he'd have to come and see him. Khan said he thought Hatton was a better fighter. Brook schooled him. Then Khan said he was looking at Senchenko. Brook KHTFO. Then Khan said Brook would have to win a world title. Brook did that.
..... Silence from Khan.
You have two party lines when you run out of things: 1) Milking Porter 2) Khan ducking doe.
Look at the bums he was fighting and how he'd use Khan to talk up those fights. Just look at how obsessively Brook built a career using Khan. Rafael Jakawaiez or Carson Jones the second time?
With regards to "using Khan's name". Please, you're embarrassing yourself. If anything, Khan is being held up by Kell Brook at this stage.
Imagine there's no Mayweather who Khan can constantly beg, then he'd be nothing more than the guy who made Algieri look good. He's lucky Brook wants to fight him, otherwise he would hardly be relevant in British boxing rigth now, and mediocre in American boxing. Those are the true facts. If you don't believe me look at who showed his last fight - Spike and BoxNation, on a friday night..
And you say I was embarrassing my self. You've become a borderline troll with your Brook bumboyness really. Khan was a force before he started talking about Floyd and what Khan is to Mayweather is what Brook is to Khan. A begger. Except only now it is a relevant fight.
May be because Friday is when he was scheduled to fight?
I like how you avoid the ratings for that fight...........on a Friday night of course. Mediocre LOL.
Khan is lucky he has someone that idolizes and obsesses over him this bad who'd practically hand him a World title shot, so he uses it as an insurance policy. Khan would always be popular with a certain segment within the British public many of whom aren't even boxing fans, which is good enough. Lemme guess? "OMG the irony, Khan-Mayweather".
You know you can't hold your own in a boxing exchange with me except crying and name calling, so you're hanging off of other people's quotes. Pathetic!
You have two party lines when you run out of things: 1) Milking Porter 2) Khan ducking doe.
Look at the bums he was fighting and how he'd use Khan to talk up those fights. Just look at how obsessively Brook built a career using Khan. Rafael Jakawaiez or Carson Jones the second time?
Interesting that you don't use Matt Hatton and Senchenko any more in your "resume wars" (which is your only party line) after finding out that Khan wanted to fight them
Interesting that you don't use Matt Hatton and Senchenko any more in your "resume wars" (which is your only party line) after finding out that Khan wanted to fight them
No, he already mentioned Senchenko and Hatton and giving benefit of the doubt for a second that they aren't bums what about the rest of the line up? Get it now?
At the end of the day Khan didn't fight them and you're hanging off of could'ves & would'ves, desperation. Oh and remember Khan was contemplating Senchenko and Hatton as WW debut. What was Brook's excuse who had exclusively campaigned at WW?
You know you can't hold your own in a boxing exchange with me except crying and name calling, so you're hanging off of other people's quotes. Pathetic!
No, he already mentioned Senchenko and Hatton and giving benefit of the doubt for a second that they aren't bums what about the rest of the line up? Get it now?
At the end of the day Khan didn't fight them and you're hanging off of could'ves & would'ves, desperation. Oh and remember Khan was contemplating Senchenko and Hatton as WW debut. What was Brook's excuse who had exclusively campaigned at WW?
Desperation for what? I'm not the one supporting a hypocritical lying coward.
Comment