Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley: Pacquiao Has To Deal With Mayweather Loss

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    i'm not interested about the injury as legit or not, the clear thing here is manny won 9 rounds to 3, floyd only got rounds 1,5 and 11.. we got the video in regular speed or slowmo manny outlanded floyd

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by boksingero View Post
      i'm not interested about the injury as legit or not, the clear thing here is manny won 9 rounds to 3, floyd only got rounds 1,5 and 11.. we got the video in regular speed or slowmo manny outlanded floyd
      Agreed but the PC-media is biased against Whites and Asians... so they always suck every Black person's cack they can including over-hyping every Black/Dark Latino fighter who comes along:

      Berto, Broner, Crawford, Lara, Kirkland, I could go on forever...

      Pacquiao clearly won the fight..it's actually not even debatable anymore...I had it 7-5 Pacquiao but I could definitely see 8-4 or 9-3...
      Last edited by MisanthropicNY; 06-27-2015, 10:00 AM.

      Comment


      • #33
        On second thought... this is the same no-sock-wearing and no-shower-taking idiot who said he beat Pacquiao 8-4 in the first fight when he didn't even win a round... obviously he has no clue how to judge a fight...

        Comment


        • #34
          Yeah manny doesnt believe it either or he forgot to stay the course

          Comment


          • #35
            The only ppl who buy that are Pactrds. So bcuz Pac was injured it voids the outcome...to them. Apply that same logic to Pac-Bradley, Bradley won the 1st fight with NO FEET and bcuz he was also injured in tje 2nd bout, it voids the out and Bradley wins by default. Either way, neither Bradley fight counts by Pactrds logic. So take those fights away bcuz they dont count nemore. Bradley beat Pac with NO LEGS

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by tiliheels View Post
              pacquiao and pacquiao fans alike!
              it been nearly 2 months already and i still get messages daily about slomotion tilted to the left with 5% tint on it video...i replied to one guy like "do i need to put the volume on a certain number as well..will full screen effect anything?"
              I guess if you turn ur head to the side and watch out the corner of ur eye and play the audio from Lampleys "****! ****! ****!" Moment....totally different fight!!

              Comment


              • #37
                All Bradley needs to worry about is that Pac accepted the loss to Bradley. Even though he believed he beat Bradley 10 rounds to 2.

                Pac accepts the Floyd decision even though he thinks he beat Floyd. Pac thinks the injury hindered his performance, and we know he wouldnt be the first to imply that dont we? Bradley implied his leg hindered his performance in the first fight, and not to mention the second fight.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MisanthropicNY View Post
                  Agreed but the PC-media is biased against Whites and Asians... so they always suck every Black person's cack they can including over-hyping every Black/Dark Latino fighter who comes along:

                  Berto, Broner, Crawford, Lara, Kirkland, I could go on forever...

                  Pacquiao clearly won the fight..it's actually not even debatable anymore...I had it 7-5 Pacquiao but I could definitely see 8-4 or 9-3...

                  LoL stay salty, pac only land double digits in punches 2 or 3 rds, and thats enough activity, for pac roids....And judges dont have the benefit of slo-mo, tinted, and slightly tilted video. Oh yea what White fighter do you have as an example? every white fighter is over-hyped. what about the guy that was on the subway commercial a few years ago....Berto was undefeated, Broner was a 3 division champion (with a high ko%), Crawford just beat a undefeated highly hyped olympic fighter...I could go on forever also. Just stop your crying and take it like a man. There is no way Pac won, he got outclassed, he got exposed, now he's saying he'll be ready to start training in 2 months after a "severe tear" just like you guys think he had a growth and power surge at the age of 29...his record is now .500 for his last few fights. You guys are delusional. You bring up castillo fight and have it posted with the number of thrown and landed punches but now you discount it.....what a hypocrite. Suck it up fairy, your god got exposed and he continues to expose himself. So now he heals up from surgery on a severely torn rotator cuff in 4 months and you believe it! Youre embarrassing yourself

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Weebler I View Post
                    Fighters who have claimed injuries impeded performance have no place telling others not to do it, especially Tim fkin Bradley who did it after both Pacquiao fights.

                    Just listen to it, 1:10, right in Pacquiao's face, yet this is the guy who tells him not to complain?

                    I don't know for sure that his injury claims were true or not but with that being said for me an injury excuse more believable if someone doesn't forget to mention it somehow on the post fight interview and doesn't say first only on the post fight interview after he had the brainstorm with his promoter and manager. It still can be just an excuse if he says it already in the ring but if someone says only on just the post fight interview after he lost then it's no doubt that it's just an excuse.

                    Comment


                    • #40

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP