Amir Khan Talks Brook, Mayweather and Thurman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #11
    The Brook fight would be his biggest payday and Brook has a world title. That's reason enough to fight him.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #12
      Originally posted by talz
      He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he...
      He flopped on the floor 6 times at elite level. So it's better to beat a guy who flopped at elite level than a guy who is a "hypejob" who you say has never been proven at that level?

      Even though Khan said that Brook had "proved himself 100%" after the Porter fight

      Rough times for the Khanturds.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #13
        Originally posted by Salim_Shady
        Provodnikov and Pacquiao beat everyone Brook has faced. (Porter may outbox Provodnikov). So hypejob world champion Algieri has fought better opposition than Kell Brook so stop whinging.
        I didn't call Algieri a "hypejob". Khan is saying he would get no credit for beating Brook because people would call him a "hypejob".

        What credit was he expecting to get from beating Algieri? And he looked like turd just to top it all over.

        Comment

        • MrRolltide91
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2010
          • 12208
          • 167
          • 1
          • 30,631

          #14
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          The Brook fight would be his biggest payday and Brook has a world title. That's reason enough to fight him.
          yep.......

          Comment

          • arraamis
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 8319
            • 583
            • 439
            • 23,488

            #15
            Originally posted by DonSimon87
            In a latest interview Amir Khan discusses in more depth his reasons behind not fighting Kell Brook and his thoughts on a Thurman fight. The Mayweather subject is briefly brought up but there is nothing new here!

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc


            Comment

            • boliodogs
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2008
              • 33358
              • 824
              • 1,782
              • 309,589

              #16
              I don't have time to read what Khan has to say. He could have and should have fought Thurman or Brook in his last fight if he is as good as he claims to be. He is afraid to fight either of them and that seems pretty obvious. Now he says Mayweather and Pacquiao should man up and fight him. He should have fought Brook or Thurman because a win over either of them would have earned him the right to challenge Mayweather and Pacquiao. Instead he fought Algieri who was coming off an incredibly one sided loss to Pacquiao. Khan cherry picked Algieri and then had his hands full and did lots of running and holding. Khan struggles with guys like Diaz and Algieri. Brook and Thurman would knock Khan out so team Khan will never fight them.

              Comment

              • RetroSpeed05
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2014
                • 4722
                • 353
                • 13
                • 192,403

                #17
                "Mys name gets mentioned with guy like Mayweather, Pacquiao". Lol deluded, only you mention your name with them and become a joke when you do.

                Comment

                • TheCleaner
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 506
                  • 15
                  • 20
                  • 10,822

                  #18
                  how annoying that he speaks in the 3rd person...

                  as ever, completely contradictory talking levels. brook beat porter, who just beat broner, a guy khan was wanting for his last fight!?!?!? true that it doesn't prove brook would then beat khan, but there on the same level for their best recent ww win. as for begging for a Bradley fight, how full off s#it is this guy allowed to be without being called out for it!!! he ducked the Bradley fight, tried to say his camp didn't tell him... man would be firing people if that were even slightly true

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #19
                    There's not much to say about Khan any longer. He's completely deluded.

                    The only one that mentions Khan's name alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao is himself

                    When Mayweather was asked about Khan last week he looked at the interviewer like: Khan who?

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #20
                      "there could be the winner of the broner vs Porter fight"

                      Oh god

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP