Amir Khan Talks Brook, Mayweather and Thurman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DonSimon87
    Contender
    • Sep 2013
    • 201
    • 11
    • 0
    • 6,745

    #1

    Amir Khan Talks Brook, Mayweather and Thurman

    In a latest interview Amir Khan discusses in more depth his reasons behind not fighting Kell Brook and his thoughts on a Thurman fight. The Mayweather subject is briefly brought up but there is nothing new here!

  • SalimShady1212
    Head Of Team Matthysse
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2015
    • 3972
    • 156
    • 488
    • 11,485

    #2
    He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #3
      Queen Contradiction doing what she does best at the moment - making a tit out of herself.

      "Kell Brook is begging to fight me"

      "I think Kell Brook should be fighting someone like Bradley who refused the fight against me when I was begging for the fight against him"

      Comment

      • Boxfan83
        The Coach
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 15839
        • 2,101
        • 732
        • 160,371

        #4
        Originally posted by Salim_Shady
        He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names.
        Yeah sorta like the way hype job Khan was being dissed after he got KO'd by Bredis Prescott lol losing to Mayweathers nothing to hang your head about anyway. Losing to Amir without at least wobbling would be pretty humbling though...

        Comment

        • SalimShady1212
          Head Of Team Matthysse
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2015
          • 3972
          • 156
          • 488
          • 11,485

          #5
          Originally posted by Boxfan83
          Yeah sorta like the way hype job Khan was being dissed after he got KO'd by Bredis Prescott lol losing to Mayweathers nothing to hang your head about anyway. Losing to Amir without at least wobbling would be pretty humbling though...
          Exactly but boxing fans are fickle and the win will not mean much unless Kell bounces back big time.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #6
            Originally posted by Salim_Shady
            He's right in the sense that if Kell loses after Amir or Mayweather beat him then they will say he was a hypejob anyway. Kell needs a couple more big tests/names.
            So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level.

            Yep that's better for his legacy!

            Comment

            • talz
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 1344
              • 52
              • 2
              • 12,427

              #7
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level.

              Yep that's better for his legacy!
              He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he...

              Comment

              • SalimShady1212
                Head Of Team Matthysse
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 3972
                • 156
                • 488
                • 11,485

                #8
                Originally posted by talz
                He lost once before to the fighter of the decade, hardly a flop is he...
                Brooktards struggle with logic.

                Comment

                • SalimShady1212
                  Head Of Team Matthysse
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2015
                  • 3972
                  • 156
                  • 488
                  • 11,485

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  So instead of beating a "hypejob", he'll fight Algieri's who was a complete flop at elite level.

                  Yep that's better for his legacy!
                  Provodnikov and Pacquiao beat everyone Brook has faced. (Porter may outbox Provodnikov). So hypejob world champion Algieri has fought better opposition than Kell Brook so stop whinging.

                  Comment

                  • boxingfan1986
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 415
                    • 11
                    • 4
                    • 6,521

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    Queen Contradiction doing what she does best at the moment - making a tit out of herself.

                    "Kell Brook is begging to fight me"

                    "I think Kell Brook should be fighting someone like Bradley who refused the fight against me when I was begging for the fight against him"

                    What an idiot. Genuinely is a dumb guy.

                    Funny thing is, he was never this outspoken in his early years. Understandable though. As a young fighter, you dont go shouting your mouth off. Since he's gone to America.. he's seen what the fighters do over there. Floyd, Broner, Malignaggi, Bradley and he's thinking, "Man, I need to be like that" Problem is, he hasnt got 2 brains cells to rub together and everytime he opens his mouth, he ends up overspeaking on something, saying something he shouldnt have, putting his big foot into his own mouth once again, contradicting himself, lying, or just exxagerating the truth. Once again, what a clown

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP