Who has the better resume - Golovkin or Danny Garcia?

[FrankieBruno]

Danny obviously lol

but one day Triple G will surpass his resume, if someone has the balls to fight him


Danny also has a better resume than Kelly Brook

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well then, could you perhaps explain why GGG is so universally loved whilst Danny is hated? Considering Danny has the better resume. Surely you can shed some light with your 43,000 posts.

What does my post count have to do with anything? Who's alt are you?

There are a number of reasons I'd say. Danny is with Haymon. He beat an internet darling power puncher in Matthysse whose fans also tend to be fans of Golovkin - another internet darling power puncher.

I can't defend the Rod Salka debacle which was the worst cherry pick I've ever seen in my lifetime but other than that, Garcia won me over after I initially thought he was a completely **** average fighter. I mean he isn't outstanding either but he can fight.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Danny obviously lol

but one day Triple G will surpass his resume, if someone has the balls to fight him


Danny also has a better resume than Kelly Brook

Obsessed

[HanzGruber]

because one is trying to make fights happen, while the other is resting on his wins in the past and not trying to make fights happen

He just beat lamont peterson.. People act like that was a cup cake fight then cry "robbery"

[supRa]

how is this even close? Garcia by far

[boxingsupreme87]

He just beat lamont peterson.. People act like that was a cup cake fight then cry "robbery"

This is true. Lamont was literally running for his life for the first half of the fight.

[buge]

Garcia:

• Kendall Holt - decent fighter on the way down, had lost 2 of last 4
• Erik Morales * 2 - way past prime, doesn't count
• Amir Khan - good win against good fighter still prime
• Zab Judah - decent win, but Judah was not near prime
• Lucas Matthysse - very good win against very good fighter still prime, close decision
• Mauricio Herrera - robbery victory
• Lamont Peterson - arguably a robbery, not dominant that's for sure

Golovkin:

• Kassim Ouma - decent fighter on the way down, had lost 2 of last 4
• Grzegorz Proksa - decent fighter
• Nobuhiro Ishida - decent win, KO was awesome against a guy now fighting (journeymen) at HW
• Matthew Macklin - good win against good opponent still in prime
• Curtis Stevens - good win against solid opponent still in prime
• Daniel Geale - good win against former titleholder still in prime
• Marco Rubio - good win against longtime fringe contender
• Martin Murray - good win against good opponent still in prime

Golovkin has more good victories against quality prime opponents. Garcia has Matthysse and Khan who are a little better wins (those guys weren't p4p quality either) but also has a couple robberies against the level of guys GGG KOs.

It's close, so I'll give it to GGG because his wins are much more dominant.

[PulpFriction]

Well then, could you perhaps explain why GGG is so universally loved whilst Danny is hated? Considering Danny has the better resume. Surely you can shed some light with your 43,000 posts.

because one is trying to make fights happen, while the other is resting on his wins in the past and not trying to make fights happen

There's your answer! Now i'm sure you'll say something ****** like "but he ducking Ward doe!" Danny obv has a better resume. Gtfoh with this troll thread.

[KO'er]

Golovkin is undisputedly the best in his division, IMO he demolishes everybody at 160. Garcia ain't undoubtedly the best at 140, or even in his very own weight division at 142lbs.

[b00g13man]

Garcia quite easily.