Comments Thread For: Khan: No Pay For Brook, Fought Bums His Whole Career

[alexKO]

Khan is referring to Brook's "entire career", not just 147. Khan's opponents are way way better than the guys Brook fought in his entire career (except Porter & that guy you branded as recent champ ...there's no doubt about that.

You're going back over 3 years to Khan's 140 reign and incase you've forgotten, his career at 140 ended with a close defeat to Peterson and a ragdolling at the hands of Garcia. Since he moved up, he's done absolutely nothing of note.

[Lazakill]

Brook's resume at 147 is superior.

LOL, no it ****ing is not. What, just because of Porter alone? HELL NO.

[LacedUp]

LOL, no it ****ing is not. What, just because of Porter alone? HELL NO.

How is it not better than Khan's Please stop it.

[alexKO]

Not denying Khan's career opponents were better. At all. Far above Brook's.

But what has he done since getting destroyed by Garcia that's better than Brook? Nothing.

But Senchenko was a recent champ? That's a fact. He was as much a champ as Alexander was.

Also, Khan's winning resume is vastly overrated. Take away Maidana which was an excellent win - and you're stuck with a lot of average guys. Some of which were over the hill.

Khan fanboys actually include Peterson and Garcia on his 'resume'. Brutal knockout defeats don't count in the real world.

[Lazakill]

You're going back over 3 years to Khan's 140 reign and incase you've forgotten, his career at 140 ended with a close defeat to Peterson and a ragdolling at the hands of Garcia. Since he moved up, he's done absolutely nothing of note.

Collazo - came off a massive KO win of Ortiz and has never been handled the way Khan handled him. This was a top win.

Alexander - Recent world champion, who again was never dominated so thoroughly as Khan did.

Algieri - Beat so called 'beast' Provodnikov and came off a 12rd UD loss against P4P #2 fighter Pacquiao.

Yep, nothing of note.. **** off.

[alexKO]

LOL, no it ****ing is not. What, just because of Porter alone? HELL NO.

Truly delusional. Porter is better than any welterweight Khan has faced and clearly beat Khan's best welterweight opponent - Alexander.

[Lazakill]

How is it not better than Khan's Please stop it.

How is it? Are you going to say

Porter
Jo Jo Dan
Gavin

outweigh...

Collazo
Alexander
Algieri

Yeah ok, LOL.

[alexKO]

Collazo - came off a massive KO win of Ortiz and has never been handled the way Khan handled him. This was a top win.

Alexander - Recent world champion, who again was never dominated so thoroughly as Khan did.

Algieri - Beat so called 'beast' Provodnikov and came off a 12rd UD loss against P4P #2 fighter Pacquiao.

Yep, nothing of note.. **** off.

Collazo - beat a washed up quitter in Ortiz.

Alexander - mauled by Porter, that B-level guy that Brook fought.

Algieri - dropped 8 or 9 times across 2 fights with Pacquiao and Provodnikov including a 120-102 defeat to Pacquiao.

As I said, nothing of note.

[alexKO]

How is it? Are you going to say

Porter
Jo Jo Dan
Gavin

outweigh...

Collazo
Alexander
Algieri

Yeah ok, LOL.

Porter is better than the lot.

[Mikel 45]

Kell brook a world champion is chasing khan

Should be the other way around! Kell has a strong dislike for khan and actually wants to smash him! Khan an ex champion who dislikes brook also should be begging for this fight!

1) World title up for grabs
2) Big payday ( wembley)
3) both dislike eachother.

The only conclusion is that khan doesnt want it anytime soon. He knows if he loses to brook he's done for. I have been hard on brook in the past fighting weak opponents, but come on amir stop fooling people.

And for the record I like khan too. But he doesn't want it